From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: More missing options for guile/doc/guile.1 Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:22:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: <8CD818E9822F6DE-D0C-29CF8@Webmail-m115.sysops.aol.com> <8739otg977.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296069496 19870 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2011 19:18:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 19:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: Neil Jerram Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 26 20:18:11 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PiAsc-00011r-5R for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 20:18:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46497 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiAsb-00019s-IE for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:18:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=38762 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiAsW-00019X-5U for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:18:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiAsU-00054M-JD for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:18:04 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:38026 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiAsU-000546-D8 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:18:02 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625B24977; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:18:50 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=yM/BlKCPDZK8BPzNQZQfd4+oVMg=; b=sDOY2h kvdNkUE33bflnUyhrpRHBnLl5YAOqSa6sA7emUL7Bxtd0E5ORu+YpgXpykQEPJDw qVeXMP5XiN8aYOyIW0TAANIw1guaXWWtk4hD25j1G5BLAVas9lJg1RiZufZ2w7JG GrFSVuAkBwK38rJf8/NZg1d7RdnZxo/cd+WV8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Ir6DSPYI2SQyeleNQrk7/MJVHIJ4+1oO hXmQ+UvndfhBOi637B6joaFUC4ZERzDivFzU8vZc05edrfKPzPwlxHVy5qQaG1Fa wDMdYoOKmK5vStdx/+Ss1UpC6bACUN/Fsy8Mi/WaloxdrvmEIZeOc7oLaT1gbACT 6U3+Cem3i6o= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB044975; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:18:48 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 540E94974; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 14:18:45 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <8739otg977.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> (Neil Jerram's message of "Sat, 15 Jan 2011 21:15:24 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 19D74A9C-2981-11E0-BE50-BC4EF3E828EC-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5028 Archived-At: On Sat 15 Jan 2011 22:15, Neil Jerram writes: > Mark Harig writes: > >> Here is a list of additional options that are not described >> in the guile manual page: > > Thank you for pointing these out, and for suggesting suitable text. > However, rather than applying these updates, I wonder if the OPTIONS > section of guile.1 should instead be autogenerated from the `Invoking > Guile' node of the manual? > > Andy/Ludo, any objection to that? I have no objection, no; and I'm sorry I didn't see this mail before committing some other changes and asking for feedback. I'm a bit behind, you see! How do you see the man page? Should it be complete, or terse? I am leaning towards the latter, to be honest... Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/