From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs,gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs Subject: Re: -Wundef warning in striconveh.h Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:03:44 +0100 Message-ID: References: <4D82151D.50303@redhat.com> <4D8233A6.3090201@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300382111 22745 80.91.229.12 (17 Mar 2011 17:15:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org, bug-gnulib@gnu.org, Eric Blake To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 17 18:15:05 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0Gms-0006PH-B6 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:15:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58832 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q0GcB-0000F4-0J for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:03:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=57353 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q0Gbx-0000D5-Dv for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:03:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0Gbw-00015p-CW for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:03:45 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:43201 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0Gbt-00015H-D9; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:03:41 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDEBB42C9; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:05:13 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=62igXb1/AeQDYcol6uGGXM/hCiM=; b=CleB0c qiznDHK7I8eWeJaL1mRb4xouytq//x5Np0tFC3zsyY12Ri2x2EQTbmmiJ/vkWU4H H3SGMlyHTQhYdTN5l5bXC4H0gfVQvVeDgpgdrEVJnTmd46/V5jEhjGLqeyOAywuP 4PJg4wd+tjnptKJ2xWNrNkWN4YPdmbXWQQ2f8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=wI6gHN+oAq5q2FjpolWpvdYufCBCxmPP jVefhsLVGl0/FBbo/gCgq1msjF2eYUIYjbyXJWxOeE9E0xmF1+1Is1uDAfD8PP5C IbtUsY83jZcdR/rZxa5dlw01iqPdKzmjWq5Kwi7r1KAFTDlkLMNpeKlwhsUCaA9d onWD2+3zeac= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9932C42C1; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:05:09 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8E22342B9; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:05:05 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4D8233A6.3090201@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Thu, 17 Mar 2011 09:15:34 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: B6FE2364-50B8-11E0-998C-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5335 gmane.comp.lib.gnulib.bugs:25676 Archived-At: On Thu 17 Mar 2011 17:15, Paul Eggert writes: > On 03/17/2011 07:46 AM, Andy Wingo wrote: >> Can you consider changing this one header file? It does not sound like >> an issue on which it is fruitful to be stubborn. > > Well, there is a bit of stubbornness on both sides here, no? :-) Hehe, point taken. I wouldn't have bothered you, but my users keep compiling with that and -Werror... they are the stubborn ones! :) Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/