From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: Guile 1.9: bug in load Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:59:16 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4AFDC089.6010101@gnu.org> <4B03C6FD.5060802@gnu.org> <4BACB081.1000604@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1279364204 19689 80.91.229.12 (17 Jul 2010 10:56:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 10:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: Luca Saiu Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jul 17 12:56:43 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oa54U-0005gQ-4D for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:56:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58074 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oa54T-0004LT-F2 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:56:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=54500 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oa54O-0004L2-1s for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:56:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oa54M-0001Bb-1C for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:56:35 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:43598 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oa54L-0001BX-Tt; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:56:33 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5C5C5375; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:56:33 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=YiqfCPkaKyNk6wEA+/zTTqQRTDs=; b=AxkG0S 32DgWZZnRsyDMLwE1Iei2EIxJuM7LKpW+/ST2ps9dXfaj96PqPPO85qgr9xaToqe XZPxplbgAeAEhzvbWAU4VWMsXjji/LJhUsD/nWkQdtgvuUDFMpl2ahqQj4hdU09R mrxv90ywpwsyQwGFtQLGAtGZ0m2PlOwPUjQfI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=lTejyUt9p+3qQJRLApkaU2pPkS40CZYt ujCqLWI/G7h1Pdw/wg7yMIQ2Z6zzpj7NxvTMTKGgw/93qfE11PG0U9BY0XN52L2n 1Stfv6iDSRzb9F9GxkXimRCQcUOuyGGLv5zjA7w/gKfoT10xCA8dLb2cNDNP1oAA Hr7By+9Pebg= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34859C5374; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:56:32 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [81.38.186.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA996C5372; Sat, 17 Jul 2010 06:56:29 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4BACB081.1000604@gnu.org> (Luca Saiu's message of "Fri, 26 Mar 2010 14:02:57 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: F5A456F6-9191-11DF-850B-9056EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4706 Archived-At: Hi Luca, Can you file a bug for this? https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=guile I didn't see an obvious solution at the start, and so I forgot about it; but we should have an answer for it. Collecting the info in a place other than my inbox would be a great start :) Thanks! Andy On Fri 26 Mar 2010 14:02, Luca Saiu writes: > Hello again. > > Andy, you had asked me to ping you if the problem was still there after > some time. I still see it in 1.9.9. > > Thanks to you and the whole team for your great work, > > Andy Wingo wrote: >> On Wed 18 Nov 2009 11:05, Luca Saiu writes: >> >>> Andy Wingo wrote: >>>> On Fri 13 Nov 2009 21:24, Luca Saiu writes: >>>> >>>>> load should call canonicalize-path relative to the directory of the file >>>>> which loads the other one, not relative to `pwd`. >>>> Has this changed since 1.8? >>> Yes, it has changed. >> >> OK, then we have to fix it then :) >> >>> If you need a distilled test case, please tell me; it should be quite >>> easy to build. >> >> No, it's a fairly easy thing to reproduce. Please poke us if we haven't >> fixed it within a couple weeks. >> >> Happy hacking, >> >> Andy > > > -- > Luca Saiu > http://www-lipn.univ-paris13.fr/~saiu > GNU epsilon: http://www.gnu.org/software/epsilon > Marionnet: http://www.marionnet.org -- http://wingolog.org/