From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: [1.9.12][OpenBSD] run time failure ... Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:32:08 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100908192137.GH8535@x.lence.net> <20100908221255.GL8535@x.lence.net> <87fwxhb842.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284290949 25660 80.91.229.12 (12 Sep 2010 11:29:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2010 11:29:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 12 13:29:07 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oukk6-0006Oe-TC for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:29:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52443 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oukk6-0000mY-8G for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 07:29:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=55028 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Oukjz-0000iw-96 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 07:29:00 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oukjy-00014M-40 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 07:28:59 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:41294 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Oukjy-00014I-1j; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 07:28:58 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209EDD520D; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 07:28:57 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=tKlOvPgeBAhF 4qlZjmWpUG/5jlE=; b=sn7luX/8qDlryrfFKxABC58xuG1QWzzjqo8dzt8eY/zI h5buWkLPnJrOKgvfclrSBC+ubeQnRkLWVzN9TfG5WmBOLsLe5vDkCYgMAESZbRRo WBTagZFmgBYA5Tp4a00u9evj44WBhfcpsNMMoensh1DiS4vcH4Wn4ubCw18KoSY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=S/31mm iFtjUPaExS0t0eMtI+CjMKpsfX6wjdiwfBcEeRTye28bL/7yNqFj+1/5+FNO/iXT lF38vrNOhSgdFcJs5ARtISIRt1br+bFAGj/Ja2032ePHrxcdMBegt6TRCjfVyc4G X2rsBEruMoZOtCb5tC4UUMi9EZ+TYfnv1aW8k= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BA3ED520C; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 07:28:56 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [83.44.190.100]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1F606D520B; Sun, 12 Sep 2010 07:28:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87fwxhb842.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:29:17 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EDCD3780-BE60-11DF-8A1C-030CEE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4802 Archived-At: Hi, On Fri 10 Sep 2010 23:29, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > Andy Wingo writes: > >> Now we need to figure out what's going on >> with --disable-shared builds. > > It=E2=80=99s not supported: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/guile-devel@gnu.org/msg02985.html > > But it may become suddenly supported once SRFI-1 is in Scheme. :-) This is a bit ridiculous. Let's just pull all that srfi C code into the core. They are all no-ops except for srfi-60. The bindings should remain invisible to the default Scheme environment. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/