From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: [bug #30170] Auto-compilation erroneously recompiles dependencies [1.9.11] Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:05:31 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100617-132027.sv15145.53631@savannah.gnu.org> <20100618-145453.sv15145.14315@savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276880599 19542 80.91.229.12 (18 Jun 2010 17:03:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:03:19 +0000 (UTC) To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , bug-guile@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 18 19:03:15 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPeyI-0001AM-Kd for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 19:03:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57753 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OPeyI-0004sT-6q for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:03:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48710 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OPeyA-0004sE-Qt for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:03:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPey9-0000KJ-Cb for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:03:06 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:37406 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OPey9-0000KF-9i; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:03:05 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038F1BDC9B; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:03:05 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=stpMuk4PxMWZ zcuYkPUvl+niL2g=; b=wJ3wrvzU3pXV+Dy1csVi9MVmZt1XLY/i2EcRIpmUIJSE tUlIWPV8tylvR4TNXMyl/F/GFtwOJ9O/yW+1/jmtr6UutoSb0vhMfOYYZ2KejHIe P500pzL4wh+yfk30cUTUdt/pPu+b68Y02EmdZMQZTkjO35AAi8wekJ/mH6FpBQQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:subject :references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=M3nN3a iiDS1dW5etn027tbdKp9T3PhCi+v9l5US4k62uAgAlIxXD4hbGkQkSHvbsNh0ovl Nk7bdvnt6ORis3yjES0vgNFpEYTnmkCjKsYtQPw+YkfG1ESoF9WV43gPgNtgi3kw OYnR6GqbcZsZms9NbY0ivlgNdH1Ml1j/MR8fI= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DF4BDC99; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:03:03 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [79.151.219.253]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D89D8BDC98; Fri, 18 Jun 2010 13:03:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20100618-145453.sv15145.14315@savannah.gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22's?= message of "Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:54:53 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 5BAD2430-7AFB-11DF-906B-9056EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4680 Archived-At: On Fri 18 Jun 2010 16:54, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wr= ites: > Andy> Is it because of "."? What if you replaced "." with `pwd` ? > > Indeed, that solves the problem: [...] > Missing a `canonicalize-path'? It would seem so. Would you like to fix this? :-) Look in load.c:763. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/