unofficial mirror of bug-guile@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: "Anton Vidovic" <anton.vidovic@gmx.de>
Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Manual bug, old manuals.
Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2011 22:26:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3fwq9efor.fsf@unquote.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110325195252.302150@gmx.net> (Anton Vidovic's message of "Fri, 25 Mar 2011 20:52:52 +0100")

On Fri 25 Mar 2011 20:52, "Anton Vidovic" <anton.vidovic@gmx.de> writes:

> In the 2.0 manual, probably in 1.8 and 1.6 also, in section 2.4 "Writing
> guile extensions", the function "scm_num2dbl" is used in the code
> example. This function was, as I could find out, deprecated in 1.4 and
> removed in 1.6.

This has been fixed in git.  I updated the 2.0 docs on the site.

> Second, I would ask you to put back the 1.8 manual on 
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs.html.

Done.  I also added a 2.0 link, as opposed to master.

> Also I would ask you to also put back the link to the old guile
> tutorial, before it was rewritten to use gnuplot.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/guile-tut/tutorial.html
>
> gnuplot is not a part of the gnu project, and it is not GPL. It's
> licence is also bordering on non-free, since distribution of modified
> versions is not permitted, modifications can only be distributed as
> separate patches.
>
> I think that it is not OK for a core gnu project to rely on non-GNU,
> non-GPL and borderline non-free software for a beginners tutorial, no
> matter how convenient gnuplot might be.

I agree that this is a problem.  However I think it is a bad idea to
resuscitate the old one; it uses interfaces that have been removed
and/or deprecated.

How should we move forward here?

> The last point, Mike Gran has recently anounced on the dev list that he
> will remove his "Guile book", which is currently linked on
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs.html
>
> Could you please copy the book and make it available directly on the
> Guile website, for future references?

It's really out of date, but I did tar up a snapshot (including SGML
source (!)) and throw it up at
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/archive/lonelycactus-guilebook.tar.gz.
I do not want to host the unpacked version on www.gnu.org though, as it
is for 1.6, and incomplete.

Regards,

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/



      reply	other threads:[~2011-03-26 21:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-25 19:52 Manual bug, old manuals Anton Vidovic
2011-03-26 21:26 ` Andy Wingo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m3fwq9efor.fsf@unquote.localdomain \
    --to=wingo@pobox.com \
    --cc=anton.vidovic@gmx.de \
    --cc=bug-guile@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).