From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: scm_i_print_symbol_name() in libguile/print.c ... Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 17:00:03 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302533991 5028 80.91.229.12 (11 Apr 2011 14:59:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:59:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: Wolfgang J Moeller Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 11 16:59:47 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9Iag-0002tF-Gn for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 16:59:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33513 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q9Iae-0008Cq-Vz for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:59:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49874 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q9Iaa-0008BQ-5j for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:59:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9IaY-0007Ft-UN for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:59:40 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:38720 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q9IaY-0007FW-Ju for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:59:38 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6544644E2; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:01:34 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=ObfkqvqiUF7uqmTRLZu2c6/6BEc=; b=PKfeqE qMyEOo8n9n6Ju8pnzwsh7bPGhNlhJdCz1tnkqUtn/+KCWBkbXIHS/IS4Cjmwt7oX x/e9LP3X7acoR/yB6WhdHjVo6e+ZrYcLuyI1HcjzMkaZBJBCOl0KBjgXoLkCqYAN JhEmooUHT3K2AQISTWxn6L8NEQS3nyKQkO9M4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=AbCe1ErxFzUL3JCaKnsJEj5qcnRHLNWt lVNyZ9un9wSu/UxCBPla6GxXBDaKGm+tJ25FMSXVpyEYNdVQlEoC2mPbkX9smMfP kpUYO4Ze0TTD+DTPMJr0AKS2grUQpdJjAAV9mtSPMSIX1r+2T5t9tFbH/2TB7uFM hJx6QDEhIeQ= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2082D44E1; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:01:32 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69AA744DF; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 11:01:30 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Wolfgang J. Moeller's message of "Mon, 11 Apr 2011 14:23:18 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 96268A4E-644C-11E0-8A90-E8AB60295C12-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5446 Archived-At: Hi, On Mon 11 Apr 2011 14:23, Wolfgang J Moeller writes: > Subsequently I noticed that `psyntax-pp.scm' is full of symbols > #{name\ number}# which so far, would _not_ be read in > as the original "gensym"s. > > This is going to change if you re-generate `psyntax-pp.scm' > using the "fixed" GUILE. Hope it doesn't hurt ... No, it doesn't. The backslash was an accident, and anyway after fixing the reader too #{foo\ bar}# reads the same as #{foo bar}#. Those symbols need to be unique lexically, but not globally, so it's not a big deal. At some point we will need globally unique gensyms but this change does not adversely impact the current state of things. Cheers, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/