From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: guile-2.0.0 fails to build without threads Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 10:45:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4D9DCE98.5080808@gentoo.org> <87y63gj765.fsf@rapitore.luna> <87aafusesz.fsf@rapitore.luna> <874o62s7hu.fsf@rapitore.luna> <87y63eqmp3.fsf@rapitore.luna> <87hb9d4o8n.fsf@rapitore.luna> <87oc2xdxkv.fsf@rapitore.luna> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305967574 25223 80.91.229.12 (21 May 2011 08:46:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 21 May 2011 08:46:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: Marco Maggi Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 21 10:46:03 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QNhov-00008S-I5 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 May 2011 10:46:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44134 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNhov-0000Z9-0F for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 21 May 2011 04:46:01 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37787) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNhor-0000Yt-Dp for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 21 May 2011 04:45:58 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNhoq-0004VM-7H for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 21 May 2011 04:45:57 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:43591 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNhop-0004VH-Vt for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 21 May 2011 04:45:56 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A566824BA; Sat, 21 May 2011 04:48:01 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=+Gp2Xxhgl8lULdEwv+5UJPz0nEg=; b=WpiQgS iNJwml3PIC6/DEynXNvGMAGhOUW3Iu/IJ52ABhJAdUo53KrHyolULlWyV1ipv5Rk o0xpPYflF/kEQym9rIA+Rv6bJQX/LhLxBZtkgeWHQWeHMmBpkdHw3q7zlAQ4oM5A x9O/C9vxnz/DoTfqDrwiAtgBPo1ckTzUHHX/s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=CeqEx5w+zans4dKZ2UkosU15aWsVzW3s EeLAsxAa3fM2YfAjngnbQupIgY26kObvRUK0MPkaXXblgYaqc4bn/byOAcoIwoYb tRz9GUi4KtrSsNCg0Y0fOaxb870OrCmzwyyX9HrGQv3AH/jp6ioFCyNB5yLSW7/Z hfCMv0RHnrk= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5F024B9; Sat, 21 May 2011 04:48:00 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF7E424B8; Sat, 21 May 2011 04:47:58 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87oc2xdxkv.fsf@rapitore.luna> (Marco Maggi's message of "Fri, 20 May 2011 20:41:04 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 085806B6-8387-11E0-B30C-BBB7F5B2FB1A-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5597 Archived-At: On Fri 20 May 2011 20:41, Marco Maggi writes: > Andy Wingo wrote: >> Thanks. You seem to be running on system in which the >> stack grows up. Is that the case? Check >> libguile/scmconfig.h and config.log. > > Yes, I have: > > #define SCM_STACK_GROWS_UP 1 /* 0 or 1 */ > > in "scmconfig.h"; my system is just a i686-pc-linux-gnu. But on those systems, the stack grows down, no? I suggest that this is a configuration error somehow. Check your config.log. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/