From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: guile 1.8.7 static const char foo[] is incomplete type, rejected by some compilers Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 00:49:49 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276172163 5860 80.91.229.12 (10 Jun 2010 12:16:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 12:16:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: Jay K Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 10 14:16:00 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMgfu-0001mk-G1 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:15:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57227 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OMgft-0006Pn-PV for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:15:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=52933 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OMgfo-0006Pi-LW for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:15:53 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMgfn-0004V0-Jx for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:15:52 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:60470 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OMgfn-0004SB-Hs for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:15:51 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B89C1E19; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:15:38 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=RxkPEElsx7YeLcOL0iJZJuDmujk=; b=c5Sq6K UN4Dl0Deju6TvKboP/Wand+aFkeNeq/zLqIBNGHlphOQ190rxhG3KdDkxwFCTley 4wMdGX3Einyu4zM6NScxA7I2lmSYfjCN0WvBSAAZ06q6Zv1i+whU70h94FoZNQE4 sdmo2JqVMUSj1gxk8dquldxL0QNl8yDMKy/DE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=DgBlptPyWs+tiEOleyYjftaLSa9/TLpe W4pEAH+M8Gz/y+UxTDfn/hJGvZ6A4AdWKyYCdzhVzVpNWVa4xY/b3V9KVdxc787u cqlQfHYNZ4KA6DUzTr5EKYY9E3Zx29eu/CCWJMXuqdjvvr+oskPHxRzuyKchpQkM VAsam5qDOiM= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081261E17; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:15:37 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [88.17.129.247]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6A79D1E15; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 08:15:35 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Jay K.'s message of "Wed, 9 Jun 2010 21:32:54 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E07C8DB8-7489-11DF-8414-9056EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4639 Archived-At: On Wed 09 Jun 2010 23:32, Jay K writes: > -prefix=$HOME > Indeed, duh to me, there is no bdwcgc.pc. Just to be clear, that would be bdw-gc.pc. You would need to add $HOME/lib/pkgconfig to your $PKG_CONFIG_PATH. > There is http://hpl.hp.com/personal/Hans_Boehm/gc/gc_source/gc-7.1.tar.gz > First I had gc-latest.tar.gz which is 6.8. > In neither case do I get package config file though. You should have one with 7.0 or later. Ciao, A -- http://wingolog.org/