From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: [bug #29860] Macro-generated macros get wrong module context [1.9.10] Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 16:40:50 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20100511-202905.sv15145.4085@savannah.gnu.org> <87wruwuvmc.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1274539214 27536 80.91.229.12 (22 May 2010 14:40:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 May 2010 14:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 22 16:40:12 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFps3-00053W-El for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 16:40:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37310 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFps2-000293-1S for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 10:40:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49352 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OFprt-00026f-Uu for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 10:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFprs-0004sh-7p for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 22 May 2010 10:40:01 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:38363 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OFprs-0004sd-4G; Sat, 22 May 2010 10:40:00 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E75D4B5E07; Sat, 22 May 2010 10:39:59 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=aZLETFvYwili GWkSAXyqDgrIfvA=; b=qoxstG2jvEya+2IxODHQBFlFTwgM7KmngCZH5Fpxuc8O MwMSso+b6SSueq/3uhAVaWljEV6dNQNXf7DaHNilhZTDnTo7K5fZbohVVjnJVM+F XZzjGC1CQVXGT08EhzvBfqSl6lcvMxYIVbKznk3OHJv/0G3q04aEYOOEIjbTHNA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=bdYof3 otUMgpHj/GBd4LowG1il02y0ffa++Fz/+cGYNXsRsqKdCy1tFOhvP7EK1AC/OYqf +r7lQYjTUwAhRWrHrTbvF08kleotJcuwhphfvzeHMSj20DEJNU7LLhM7x8wj6kq3 7PvkcXCB4I6Yma6t06G6YeiKANxLhX/20bcng= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E78B5E06; Sat, 22 May 2010 10:39:58 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [79.151.125.11]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D581B5E05; Sat, 22 May 2010 10:39:57 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87wruwuvmc.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s=22'?= =?utf-8?Q?s?= message of "Sat, 22 May 2010 11:35:39 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: E57E6770-65AF-11DF-A540-D033EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4604 Archived-At: On Sat 22 May 2010 11:35, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: >> Wow, that's a nasty one. Will poke. > > Please assign it to you in the bug tracker. > > Yes, we=E2=80=99ll start using a bug tracker again! :-) Apparently we will, though I will not interact with it regularly ;-) Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/