From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: guile-2.0.0 fails to build without threads Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 11:37:45 +0200 Message-ID: References: <4D9DCE98.5080808@gentoo.org> <87y63gj765.fsf@rapitore.luna> <87aafusesz.fsf@rapitore.luna> <874o62s7hu.fsf@rapitore.luna> <87y63eqmp3.fsf@rapitore.luna> <87hb9d4o8n.fsf@rapitore.luna> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305888202 22754 80.91.229.12 (20 May 2011 10:43:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 10:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: Marco Maggi Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 20 12:43:17 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QNNAq-00066p-Dk for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 12:43:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51660 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNNAp-0002IT-PY for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:43:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:33659) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNNAn-0002ID-3u for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:43:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNNAl-0002q3-QF for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:43:13 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:44923 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNNAl-0002py-Ny for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:43:11 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC124703; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:45:16 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=lyEgO1vGoX0RzV/sQA80g4WWFhU=; b=IaWxiz dTo+YzlD/XMp9CRWNLcp3nescIfR+3PAtXqVvocY00+tbSspMjL8w/bQdapEcATc Gwuhu15WaG+7hTM4LohQXkFTQ15yr22XTs0NglXxUF1XKSD0ewHOs8TR9fFF+GPh ZxytoEAEvPnJdw2fWNxf9UXopTuKdVgRGYYp0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=YOlzfC51CGMNhpciPEO2jxbCMXY9Mcop RyeEsQ5WM+TZYq+jVWXOEfm8OkfkMiRKu/2q/OPkwpHXE5mqc11kSaU4hnhyG5dL SiZBXZT1LakSMPmA+a4zSuFHBv6IPPB8DYLhiqlfnJKNMmRT4S+OwMUyL9Y2DhZk AcId+WXGT5o= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 985BD4702; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:45:15 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from unquote.localdomain (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04A204700; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:45:13 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87hb9d4o8n.fsf@rapitore.luna> (Marco Maggi's message of "Mon, 02 May 2011 08:20:56 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 3F258E34-82CE-11E0-A2CB-BBB7F5B2FB1A-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5578 Archived-At: On Mon 02 May 2011 08:20, Marco Maggi writes: > Andy Wingo wrote: >>> stack size (kbytes, -s) 8192 >> >> This should be quite large enough. If you are still >> interested in debugging this issue, can you "call >> scm_stack_report ()" in gdb from the scm_ithrow? > > Breakpoint 1, 0xb7f4fa80 in scm_ithrow () > from /home/marco/src/devel/scheme/checkouts/guile/libguile/.libs/libguile-2.0.so.22 > (gdb) call scm_stack_report() > fffffd7c of stack: 0xbfffe268 - 0xbfffe008 Thanks. You seem to be running on system in which the stack grows up. Is that the case? Check libguile/scmconfig.h and config.log. You mention in your original report: In the stable-2.0 branch I do: $ git clean -dxf $ ./autogen.sh $ ./configure \ --prefix=3D/usr/local \ --enable-shared --disable-static \ CFLAGS=3D'-O3 -march=3Di686 -mtune=3Di686' Are the "3D" things an artifact of some mailing list encoding thing, or are they a mis-paste? Andy -- http://wingolog.org/