From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: [PATCH] Declare `GC_dump' ourselves if doesn't. Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:33:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87zl4nmmpl.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <878wc45m5w.fsf@gnu.org> <87k4vodjga.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <874omro1b1.fsf@gnu.org> <87hbqrmj2d.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87my0jfdfz.fsf@gnu.org> <87d41fma0q.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1263325989 29199 80.91.229.12 (12 Jan 2010 19:53:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:53:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: Thien-Thi Nguyen Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 12 20:53:00 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NUmnS-0008Bb-6p for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:52:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36233 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUmnT-0006zt-1d for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:52:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUmgj-0002BU-46 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:46:01 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NUmge-00028B-9c for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:46:00 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=51474 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NUmge-000288-0h for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:45:56 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:54210 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NUmgd-0006uR-PJ for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:45:55 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A898090398; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:45:54 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=vZYHaSOr5Gg04A70bLHjCs5lcgw=; b=GQnLEG gppCtrHj/p5a3n3XKNUbI/pR9d92FeQhr54z66+XeI8F71L1d1Fi41bQX+g1uvuz BLDfFW1wL6PKwCAic6LzqDjPIBFCVua8KpweRhYauL7XXM1unQrAdCrPJ7nGrxBY NJU+U5reH959qgOe7TCRnoFClSpGmJwt99qM0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=LXjIe6LOkgXe7CIW6WXzOOZbTEXTy6Cb h+zY8eBuREsoTx3jgutnArDE73IQbpBGimO7nlSc9bFDcoajpbIG/hCZHE8G+0jL C4hO+6vMvNThxvugur+ufyFtAYUh4lGItRel7gWHYyxxMZIrTPMS0SqVtxCsxknp 43ETqsvQuvk= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949EE90396; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:45:53 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from unquote (unknown [81.38.180.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CF5B290395; Tue, 12 Jan 2010 14:45:51 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87d41fma0q.fsf@ambire.localdomain> (Thien-Thi Nguyen's message of "Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:51:49 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.92 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 18117A1E-FFB3-11DE-9FE2-9D59EE7EF46B-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4454 Archived-At: Hello, On Tue 12 Jan 2010 19:51, Thien-Thi Nguyen writes: > There IS something you can do: take a stand against pkg-config and > DTRT (the Autoconf Way). FWIW... I'm sympathetic to your desire to compile against 6.8, but once 7.x is more widely distributed, I think it's a win to just use pkg-config. Less hassle in the configure.ac. I like pkg-config. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/