I believe it would be better if #nil were equal? to (). It would keep *not* being equal? to #f and as such not disturb the property of transitiveness. Making #nil and () be equal? would be a lot more intuitive since they both represent the empty list, and since equal? is commonly used to test the equality of lists. Meeting this expectation would probably prevent a common type of unexpected behavior where a list coming from Elisp code is not equal? to a list coming from Scheme code, even though they have the same contents. Attached is a patch to realize the change. Note that it increases the size of compiled code that uses equal?. I don't know if this represents a problem or not. Before patch: scheme@(guile-user)> ,disassemble (lambda (x y) (equal? x y)) Disassembly of #:1:13 (x y)> at #x55dd585a0ad4: 0 (instrument-entry 131) at (unknown file):1:13 2 (assert-nargs-ee/locals 3 0) ;; 3 slots (2 args) 3 (eq? 1 0) at (unknown file):1:27 4 (je 29) ;; -> L4 5 (immediate-tag=? 1 7 0) ;; heap-object? 7 (jne 22) ;; -> L3 8 (immediate-tag=? 0 7 0) ;; heap-object? 10 (jne 15) ;; -> L2 11 (static-ref 2 96) ;; #f 13 (immediate-tag=? 2 7 0) ;; heap-object? 15 (je 7) ;; -> L1 16 (call-scm<-scmn-scmn 2 103 107 113) 20 (static-set! 2 87) ;; #f L1: 22 (scm-ref/immediate 2 2 1) 23 (handle-interrupts) 24 (tail-call) L2: 25 (make-immediate 2 4) ;; #f 26 (reset-frame 1) ;; 1 slot 27 (handle-interrupts) 28 (return-values) L3: 29 (make-immediate 2 4) ;; #f 30 (reset-frame 1) ;; 1 slot 31 (handle-interrupts) 32 (return-values) L4: 33 (make-immediate 2 1028) ;; #t 34 (reset-frame 1) ;; 1 slot 35 (handle-interrupts) 36 (return-values) After patch: scheme@(guile-user)> ,disassemble (lambda (x y) (equal? x y)) Disassembly of #:8:13 (x y)> at #x55b741d3ab94: 0 (instrument-entry 145) at (unknown file):8:13 2 (assert-nargs-ee/locals 3 0) ;; 3 slots (2 args) 3 (eq? 1 0) at (unknown file):8:27 4 (je 43) ;; -> L6 5 (immediate-tag=? 1 3583 260) ;; null? 7 (jne 12) ;; -> L2 8 (immediate-tag=? 0 3583 260) ;; null? 10 (je 5) ;; -> L1 11 (make-immediate 2 4) ;; #f 12 (reset-frame 1) ;; 1 slot 13 (handle-interrupts) 14 (return-values) L1: 15 (make-immediate 2 1028) ;; #t 16 (reset-frame 1) ;; 1 slot 17 (handle-interrupts) 18 (return-values) L2: 19 (immediate-tag=? 1 7 0) ;; heap-object? 21 (jne 22) ;; -> L5 22 (immediate-tag=? 0 7 0) ;; heap-object? 24 (jne 15) ;; -> L4 25 (static-ref 2 96) ;; #f 27 (immediate-tag=? 2 7 0) ;; heap-object? 29 (je 7) ;; -> L3 30 (call-scm<-scmn-scmn 2 103 107 113) 34 (static-set! 2 87) ;; #f L3: 36 (scm-ref/immediate 2 2 1) 37 (handle-interrupts) 38 (tail-call) L4: 39 (make-immediate 2 4) ;; #f 40 (reset-frame 1) ;; 1 slot 41 (handle-interrupts) 42 (return-values) L5: 43 (make-immediate 2 4) ;; #f 44 (reset-frame 1) ;; 1 slot 45 (handle-interrupts) 46 (return-values) L6: 47 (make-immediate 2 1028) ;; #t 48 (reset-frame 1) ;; 1 slot 49 (handle-interrupts) 50 (return-values) - Taylan