* bug#72380: srfi-64: test-end does not uninstall runner if on-final was modified
@ 2024-07-30 19:51 Tomas Volf
2024-10-01 22:34 ` Taylan Kammer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tomas Volf @ 2024-07-30 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 72380
Hello,
I think I found a bug in (srfi srfi-64) module shipped with GNU Guile.
The specification for test-end says:
> Additionally, if the matching test-begin installed a new test-runner, then the
> test-end will uninstall it, after reporting the accumulated test results in an
> implementation-defined manner.
However in following example it fails to do so:
(use-modules (srfi srfi-64))
(pk (eq? #f (test-runner-current)))
(test-begin "x")
(test-runner-on-final! (test-runner-current) (λ (_) #t))
(test-end)
(pk (eq? #f (test-runner-current)))
Resulting in:
;;; (#t)
%%%% Starting test x (Writing full log to "x.log")
;;; (#f)
I see no provision in the specification that would justify this.
Have a nice day
Tomas Volf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* bug#72380: srfi-64: test-end does not uninstall runner if on-final was modified
2024-07-30 19:51 bug#72380: srfi-64: test-end does not uninstall runner if on-final was modified Tomas Volf
@ 2024-10-01 22:34 ` Taylan Kammer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Taylan Kammer @ 2024-10-01 22:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tomas Volf, 72380
On 30.07.2024 21:51, Tomas Volf wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think I found a bug in (srfi srfi-64) module shipped with GNU Guile.
>
> The specification for test-end says:
>
>> Additionally, if the matching test-begin installed a new test-runner, then the
>> test-end will uninstall it, after reporting the accumulated test results in an
>> implementation-defined manner.
> However in following example it fails to do so:
>
> (use-modules (srfi srfi-64))
>
> (pk (eq? #f (test-runner-current)))
> (test-begin "x")
> (test-runner-on-final! (test-runner-current) (λ (_) #t))
> (test-end)
> (pk (eq? #f (test-runner-current)))
>
> Resulting in:
>
> ;;; (#t)
> %%%% Starting test x (Writing full log to "x.log")
>
> ;;; (#f)
>
> I see no provision in the specification that would justify this.
>
> Have a nice day
> Tomas Volf
>
>
Don't know how to most easily fix this upstream due to the convoluted code, but works fine with my implementation of SRFI-64.
- Taylan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-10-01 22:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-07-30 19:51 bug#72380: srfi-64: test-end does not uninstall runner if on-final was modified Tomas Volf
2024-10-01 22:34 ` Taylan Kammer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).