From: Gregory Marton <gremio@csail.mit.edu>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org
Subject: Re: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 11:59:12 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807171153320.27018@ashmore.csail.mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87hcaoy0ex.fsf@gnu.org>
> Gregory Marton <gremio@csail.mit.edu> writes:
>
>> Having done these steps, it did indeed make check, and with the
>> --without-threads flag, it even passed the timeout tests!
>
> You mean that the problem that triggered this thread vanished?
Yes. The with-timeout test script I sent a few emails ago passes if the
latest 1.8 branch guile is compiled without threads. I guess either signal
handling or sleep is somehow different when threading is enabled.
They're taking a while to run, but so far all my other tests are also
passing in mono-threaded guile 1.8.5
commit 9143131b2766d1e29e05d61b5021395b4c93a6bc Neil Jerram, July 11
>> I'm happy with this for now. Is non-threading ever likely to be
>> unsupported?
>
> There's no plan to remove mono-threading AFAIK.
Thank you.
Grem
--
------ __@ Gregory A. Marton http://csail.mit.edu/~gremio/
--- _`\<,_ .
-- (*)/ (*) bigamy: where two rites make a wrong.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~_~~~_~~~~~v~~~~^^^^~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~++~~~~~~~
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-17 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-01 19:35 signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1? Gregory Marton
2008-06-03 15:07 ` Ludovic Courtès
2008-06-03 16:05 ` Gregory Marton
2008-06-03 20:32 ` Ludovic Courtès
2008-06-06 19:37 ` Gregory Marton
2008-06-06 19:56 ` Gregory Marton
2008-06-07 10:38 ` Ludovic Courtès
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806260936100.31255@ashmore.csail.mit.edu>
[not found] ` <87bq1ngvw7.fsf@gnu.org>
2008-06-27 19:05 ` Gregory Marton
2008-06-28 18:09 ` Ludovic Courtès
2008-06-29 17:45 ` Gregory Marton
2008-06-29 18:02 ` Gregory Marton
2008-06-29 18:06 ` Gregory Marton
2008-06-30 7:38 ` Ludovic Courtès
2008-07-07 0:30 ` Gregory Marton
2008-07-07 8:57 ` Ludovic Courtès
2008-07-17 12:08 ` Gregory Marton
2008-07-17 12:37 ` Ludovic Courtès
2008-07-17 15:24 ` Gregory Marton
2008-07-17 15:51 ` Ludovic Courtès
2008-07-17 15:59 ` Gregory Marton [this message]
2008-07-17 20:47 ` Neil Jerram
2008-07-17 22:11 ` Gregory Marton
2008-07-18 8:18 ` Ludovic Courtès
2008-07-18 11:23 ` Gregory Marton
2008-07-18 12:02 ` Ludovic Courtès
2008-07-18 13:44 ` with-timeout and asynchronous alarm (was: signal handling different in 1.8.3 than 1.8.1?) Gregory Marton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0807171153320.27018@ashmore.csail.mit.edu \
--to=gremio@csail.mit.edu \
--cc=bug-guile@gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).