From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Marco Maggi" Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: guile won't compile solaris 10, ultra enterprise Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 20:55:34 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1197057351 9908 80.91.229.12 (7 Dec 2007 19:55:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 7 Dec 2007 19:55:51 +0000 (UTC) To: "bug-guile" Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 07 20:55:59 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J0jIk-0005qP-BH for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 20:55:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0jIT-0000Go-Cj for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:55:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J0jIO-0000Dl-Sd for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:55:36 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J0jIN-0000Bl-NZ for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:55:36 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J0jIN-0000BL-HI for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:55:35 -0500 Original-Received: from relay-pt2.poste.it ([62.241.5.253]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J0jIN-00024m-4l for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 07 Dec 2007 14:55:35 -0500 Original-Received: from poste.it (192.168.144.254) by relay-pt2.poste.it (7.3.122) (authenticated as marco.maggi-ipsu@poste.it) id 47588DA200011799 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 7 Dec 2007 20:55:34 +0100 X-Sensitivity: 3 X-XaM3-API-Version: 4.3 (R1) (B3pl19) X-SenderIP: 83.190.104.77 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:3665 Archived-At: "LICON, RAY (ATTPB)" wrote: >numbers.c: In function `scm_log': >numbers.c:6015: error: `_Complex_I' undeclared (first use in this >function) I have no access to your platform. The documentation of the GNU C Library seems to imply that _Complex_I was introduced with C99, can you check what standard your compiler is using? AFAICT Guile uses _Complex_I only in the definition of the macro SCM_COMPLEX_VALUE in "libguile/numbers.c". Can you try to change that instance with the value used on your platform to indicate the imaginary unit and report on the result? There were previous reports on such a thing, example: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile/2007-09/msg00003.html -- Marco Maggi "Now feel the funk blast!" Rage Against the Machine - "Calm like a bomb" _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile