From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Aberg Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:36:32 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <2810F73C-12D6-4203-9BDA-E7C0CFDF5959@telia.com> <87lione31p.fsf@netris.org> <2C04330C-5F9D-449A-B8B0-748258D5A22D@telia.com> <874nvasrg7.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328103472 15163 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2012 13:37:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 13:37:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Mark H Weaver , Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 10681@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 01 14:37:50 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsaNh-0004LK-Gc for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:37:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56887 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsaNh-0007iv-27 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:37:49 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46665) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsaNZ-0007i6-No for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:37:48 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsaNY-0005zG-Ov for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:37:41 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44692) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsaNY-0005zC-NU for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:37:40 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsaNt-0006PX-Os for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:38:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.132810347724633 (code B ref 10681); Wed, 01 Feb 2012 13:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 13:37:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48315 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsaNm-0006PE-Sa for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:37:56 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-out12.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.212]:51186) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsaNi-0006Oy-2X for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 08:37:52 -0500 Original-Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out12.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC380E008CEC6A; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:36:29 +0100 In-Reply-To: <874nvasrg7.fsf@pobox.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6142 Archived-At: On 1 Feb 2012, at 12:50, Andy Wingo wrote: >> It suggests that problem is with llvm-gcc (an clang), I think. With >> gcc-4.7 there is no libffi failure. >=20 > Is it correct to say that you experience this issue if libffi is > compiled with llvm-gcc / clang, =85 Yes, and also guile-2.0.5 (see below for more info). > ...but do not experience this issue if > libffi is compiled with gcc-4.7 ? I have not tried that one. There is not issue with libffi from latest = GIT compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2, and guile-2.0.5 compiled with SVN = gcc-4.7. > Trying to summarize; it has been hard to follow :) Indeed, as there are three compilers :-): /usr/bin/clang /usr/bin/cc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2 These are provided by Xcode 4.2.1. So if one does not set CC, one will = use llvm-gcc-4.2. This compiler, llvm-gcc-4.2, is also what I use for system installation, = as the SVN gcc-4.7 is experimental. Also gcc-4.7 was compiled using = llvm-gcc-4.2; it did not compile with gcc-4.6.2. So it seems safest to stick to llvm-gcc-4.2, as that is what package = developers mostly will check against. Hans