unofficial mirror of bug-guile@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Aberg <haberg-1@telia.com>
To: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
Cc: "Mark H Weaver" <mhw@netris.org>,
	"Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>,
	10681@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:36:32 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <F00DEC12-95FF-4B39-9DFB-E6E585E5A5C7@telia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874nvasrg7.fsf@pobox.com>

On 1 Feb 2012, at 12:50, Andy Wingo wrote:

>> It suggests that problem is with llvm-gcc (an clang), I think. With
>> gcc-4.7 there is no libffi failure.
> 
> Is it correct to say that you experience this issue if libffi is
> compiled with llvm-gcc / clang, …

Yes, and also guile-2.0.5 (see below for more info).

> ...but do not experience this issue if
> libffi is compiled with gcc-4.7 ?

I have not tried that one. There is not issue with libffi from latest GIT compiled with llvm-gcc-4.2, and guile-2.0.5 compiled with SVN gcc-4.7.

> Trying to summarize; it has been hard to follow :)

Indeed, as there are three compilers :-):
  /usr/bin/clang
  /usr/bin/cc -> llvm-gcc-4.2
  /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2
These are provided by Xcode 4.2.1. So if one does not set CC, one will use llvm-gcc-4.2.

This compiler, llvm-gcc-4.2, is also what I use for system installation, as the SVN gcc-4.7 is experimental. Also gcc-4.7 was compiled using llvm-gcc-4.2; it did not compile with gcc-4.6.2.

So it seems safest to stick to llvm-gcc-4.2, as that is what package developers mostly will check against.

Hans







  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-01 13:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org>
2012-01-31 14:21 ` bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Hans Aberg
2012-01-31 14:40   ` Andy Wingo
2012-01-31 15:04     ` Hans Aberg
2012-01-31 15:18   ` Ludovic Courtès
2012-01-31 16:59     ` Hans Aberg
2012-01-31 18:04   ` Mark H Weaver
2012-01-31 19:30     ` Hans Aberg
2012-01-31 19:35       ` Mark H Weaver
2012-01-31 19:41         ` Hans Aberg
2012-01-31 20:01         ` Hans Aberg
2012-01-31 22:02         ` Hans Aberg
2012-02-01  1:42           ` Mark H Weaver
2012-02-01  9:35             ` Hans Aberg
2012-02-01 14:14             ` Hans Aberg
2012-02-01  1:34         ` Hans Aberg
2012-02-01  1:49           ` Mark H Weaver
2012-02-01  9:18             ` Hans Aberg
2012-02-01 11:50               ` Andy Wingo
2012-02-01 13:36                 ` Hans Aberg [this message]
2012-02-01 14:53                   ` Andy Wingo
2012-02-01 15:08                     ` Hans Aberg
2012-07-06 18:23                       ` Andy Wingo
2012-07-07 12:03                         ` bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.6 released Hans Aberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=F00DEC12-95FF-4B39-9DFB-E6E585E5A5C7@telia.com \
    --to=haberg-1@telia.com \
    --cc=10681@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=mhw@netris.org \
    --cc=wingo@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).