From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Aberg Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:04:58 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87fwewue93.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328022368 4385 80.91.229.3 (31 Jan 2012 15:06:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:06:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 31 16:06:05 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFHV-0007Es-VL for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:06:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45712 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFHV-0001ko-Es for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:06:01 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36463) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFHQ-0001kh-C5 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:06:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFHG-0000P3-Nn for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:05:56 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43751) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFHG-0000Ox-Kr for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:05:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFHV-0002pD-TT for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:06:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.132802233010818 (code B ref 10681); Tue, 31 Jan 2012 15:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Jan 2012 15:05:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47374 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFGz-0002oR-L4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:05:30 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-out21.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.208]:60849) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsFGw-0002oD-J2 for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 10:05:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out21.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EC0B93A01D2F4B6; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 16:05:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87fwewue93.fsf@pobox.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6120 Archived-At: On 31 Jan 2012, at 15:40, Andy Wingo wrote: > https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?30122 I used /usr/bin/gcc -> llvm-gcc-4.2, which is different from clang. There is also this one http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guile/2011-11/msg00026.html It asks for this output: $ grep scm_t_int8 libguile/scmconfig.h typedef int8_t scm_t_int8; It is the same with gcc-4.7.0. Hans