* [bugs #11197] Error in string->number
@ 2004-12-03 8:16 anonymous
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: anonymous @ 2004-12-03 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
of the project: Guile.
/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #11197] Full Item Snapshot:
URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=11197>
Project: Guile
Submitted by: 0
On: Fri 12/03/2004 at 03:10
Category: None
Severity: 5 - Average
Item Group: None
Resolution: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Status: Open
Summary: Error in string->number
Original Submission: guile> (string->number "111111" 7)
19608
guile> (string->number "111111" 8)
37449
guile> (string->number "111111" 9)
<unnamed port>:4:1: In procedure bignum in expression (string->number "111111" 9):
<unnamed port>:4:1: Numerical overflow
ABORT: (numerical-overflow)
Type "(backtrace)" to get more information or "(debug)" to enter the debugger.
guile> (string->number "111111" 10)
111111
guile> (string->number "111111" 11)
177156
For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=11197>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [bugs #11197] Error in string->number
@ 2004-12-04 22:08 Kevin Ryde
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Ryde @ 2004-12-04 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
of the project: Guile.
/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #11197] Latest Modifications:
Changes by:
Kevin Ryde <user42@zip.com.au>
'Date:
Sat 12/04/04 at 22:02 (Australia/NSW)
------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
In fact only bases 2, 10 and 16 look right. Others have a bad bignum size calculation and overflow in various cases.
Only bases 2, 8, 10 and 16 are documented as supported, though others (below 16) are not explicitly rejected. Maybe that should change too.
/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #11197] Full Item Snapshot:
URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=11197>
Project: Guile
Submitted by: 0
On: Fri 12/03/04 at 08:10
Category: None
Severity: 5 - Average
Item Group: None
Resolution: None
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Status: Open
Summary: Error in string->number
Original Submission: guile> (string->number "111111" 7)
19608
guile> (string->number "111111" 8)
37449
guile> (string->number "111111" 9)
<unnamed port>:4:1: In procedure bignum in expression (string->number "111111" 9):
<unnamed port>:4:1: Numerical overflow
ABORT: (numerical-overflow)
Type "(backtrace)" to get more information or "(debug)" to enter the debugger.
guile> (string->number "111111" 10)
111111
guile> (string->number "111111" 11)
177156
Follow-up Comments
------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat 12/04/04 at 22:02 By: Kevin Ryde <kryde>
In fact only bases 2, 10 and 16 look right. Others have a bad bignum size calculation and overflow in various cases.
Only bases 2, 8, 10 and 16 are documented as supported, though others (below 16) are not explicitly rejected. Maybe that should change too.
For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=11197>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [bugs #11197] Error in string->number
@ 2004-12-08 23:25 Kevin Ryde
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Ryde @ 2004-12-08 23:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
of the project: Guile.
/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #11197] Latest Modifications:
Changes by:
Kevin Ryde <user42@zip.com.au>
'Date:
Wed 12/08/04 at 23:00 (Antarctica/McMurdo)
What | Removed | Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution | None | Fixed
------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
Fixed in the cvs, close this when 1.6.7 is released.
/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #11197] Full Item Snapshot:
URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=11197>
Project: Guile
Submitted by: 0
On: Fri 12/03/04 at 08:10
Category: None
Severity: 5 - Average
Item Group: None
Resolution: Fixed
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Status: Open
Summary: Error in string->number
Original Submission: guile> (string->number "111111" 7)
19608
guile> (string->number "111111" 8)
37449
guile> (string->number "111111" 9)
<unnamed port>:4:1: In procedure bignum in expression (string->number "111111" 9):
<unnamed port>:4:1: Numerical overflow
ABORT: (numerical-overflow)
Type "(backtrace)" to get more information or "(debug)" to enter the debugger.
guile> (string->number "111111" 10)
111111
guile> (string->number "111111" 11)
177156
Follow-up Comments
------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed 12/08/04 at 23:00 By: Kevin Ryde <kryde>
Fixed in the cvs, close this when 1.6.7 is released.
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat 12/04/04 at 22:02 By: Kevin Ryde <kryde>
In fact only bases 2, 10 and 16 look right. Others have a bad bignum size calculation and overflow in various cases.
Only bases 2, 8, 10 and 16 are documented as supported, though others (below 16) are not explicitly rejected. Maybe that should change too.
For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=11197>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [bugs #11197] Error in string->number
@ 2004-12-28 23:47 Kevin Ryde
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Ryde @ 2004-12-28 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
This mail is an automated notification from the bugs tracker
of the project: Guile.
/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #11197] Latest Modifications:
Changes by:
Kevin Ryde <user42@zip.com.au>
'Date:
Tue 12/28/04 at 23:26 (Antarctica/McMurdo)
What | Removed | Added
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status | Open | Closed
/**************************************************************************/
[bugs #11197] Full Item Snapshot:
URL: <http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=11197>
Project: Guile
Submitted by: 0
On: Fri 12/03/04 at 08:10
Category: None
Severity: 5 - Average
Item Group: None
Resolution: Fixed
Privacy: Public
Assigned to: None
Status: Closed
Summary: Error in string->number
Original Submission: guile> (string->number "111111" 7)
19608
guile> (string->number "111111" 8)
37449
guile> (string->number "111111" 9)
<unnamed port>:4:1: In procedure bignum in expression (string->number "111111" 9):
<unnamed port>:4:1: Numerical overflow
ABORT: (numerical-overflow)
Type "(backtrace)" to get more information or "(debug)" to enter the debugger.
guile> (string->number "111111" 10)
111111
guile> (string->number "111111" 11)
177156
Follow-up Comments
------------------
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Wed 12/08/04 at 23:00 By: Kevin Ryde <kryde>
Fixed in the cvs, close this when 1.6.7 is released.
-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Sat 12/04/04 at 22:02 By: Kevin Ryde <kryde>
In fact only bases 2, 10 and 16 look right. Others have a bad bignum size calculation and overflow in various cases.
Only bases 2, 8, 10 and 16 are documented as supported, though others (below 16) are not explicitly rejected. Maybe that should change too.
For detailed info, follow this link:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=11197>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-12-28 23:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-28 23:47 [bugs #11197] Error in string->number Kevin Ryde
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-12-08 23:25 Kevin Ryde
2004-12-04 22:08 Kevin Ryde
2004-12-03 8:16 anonymous
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).