From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: Fix for guile-www/cgi.scm (cgi:make-cookie) Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:11:00 -0400 Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1062165494 24577 80.91.224.253 (29 Aug 2003 13:58:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 13:58:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 29 15:58:12 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19sjlU-0003Td-00 for ; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 15:58:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19sjke-0003hy-GS for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:57:20 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.22) id 19sj4T-0006Of-Uf for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:13:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.22) id 19sj23-0005Qv-75 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:11:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [207.245.84.69] (helo=colo.agora-net.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 19sj1p-0005HQ-GV for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:11:01 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by colo.agora-net.com with local (Exim 3.34 #1) id 19sj1o-00037n-00; Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:11:00 -0400 Original-To: tmh@whitefang.com In-reply-to: (message from Thamer Al-Harbash on Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:00:57 -0400 (EDT)) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:923 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:923 From: Thamer Al-Harbash Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 09:00:57 -0400 (EDT) If this patch works fine with the optargs module why not use it for the sake of simplicity? Does my patch break something? the "optargs module" has an interface and a name. its interface was changed for guile-1.6 while its name remained the same. this broke old code (a mistake that is not too late to correct). your patch would reinforce the confusion. (btw, simplicity is a matter of how much you leave out of the picture. ;-) thi _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile