From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: Fix for 1001-local-eval-error-backtrace-segfaults - please review Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 05:43:27 -0700 Sender: bug-guile-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021466875 30310 127.0.0.1 (15 May 2002 12:47:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 12:47:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org, johns776@pilot.msu.edu Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 177yCA-0007sl-00 for ; Wed, 15 May 2002 14:47:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 177yCM-0001v7-00; Wed, 15 May 2002 08:48:06 -0400 Original-Received: from ca-crlsbd-u5-c4a-a-172.crlsca.adelphia.net ([24.48.214.172] helo=giblet) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 177yBn-0001uN-00 for ; Wed, 15 May 2002 08:47:32 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by giblet with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 177y7r-0000bs-00; Wed, 15 May 2002 05:43:27 -0700 Original-To: neil@ossau.uklinux.net In-Reply-To: (message from Neil Jerram on 05 May 2002 15:00:59 +0100) Errors-To: bug-guile-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:251 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:251 From: Neil Jerram Date: 05 May 2002 15:00:59 +0100 No; the new way doesn't mutate at all. It creates a new environment that shares some substructure with the old environment. ok i see this now. But, does this test need a different execution environment? It's true for any existing test case that, if it causes a SEGV, the following test cases won't run. This doesn't worry us much because SEGVs aren't an important part of our plans :-) sorry, "different" was unclear. it needs to have an independent execution environment, which may be the same in construction as for the other tests, for precisely the reason you give. thi _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile