From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: regexp-exec fails for long strings Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 01:19:25 -0700 Sender: bug-guile-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20020425214713.GA19857@www> <20020515080420.B201@dose.pro-linux.de> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021451035 4541 127.0.0.1 (15 May 2002 08:23:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 08:23:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org, guile-user@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 177u4h-0001B8-00 for ; Wed, 15 May 2002 10:23:55 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 177u4w-0004bq-00; Wed, 15 May 2002 04:24:10 -0400 Original-Received: from ca-crlsbd-u5-c4a-a-172.crlsca.adelphia.net ([24.48.214.172] helo=giblet) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 177u4D-0004TC-00; Wed, 15 May 2002 04:23:25 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by giblet with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 177u0L-0001jQ-00; Wed, 15 May 2002 01:19:25 -0700 Original-To: wolfgang@pro-linux.de In-Reply-To: <20020515080420.B201@dose.pro-linux.de> (message from =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wolfgang_J=E4hrling?= on Wed, 15 May 2002 08:04:20 +0200) Errors-To: bug-guile-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:248 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:248 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Wolfgang_J=E4hrling?= Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 08:04:20 +0200 AFAIK, the glibc-people are rewriting the regex code for 2.3, because the current implementation got unmaintainable and has various strange limitations. This could be one of those. that's good news (that i wouldn't have known w/o this tip -- thanks!). i suppose i could contribute this as a test case. i wonder what glibc testing framework is like. thi _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile