From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: guile-snarf writes to $srcdir, which is not kosher Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 14:16:34 -0700 Sender: bug-guile-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87bscvjez9.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <873cy6f8av.fsf@zagadka.ping.de> <87vgazuun3.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> Reply-To: ttn@glug.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019596882 30243 127.0.0.1 (23 Apr 2002 21:21:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 21:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mvo@zagadka.ping.de, bug-guile@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 1707iz-0007rY-00 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 23:21:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1707iw-0006e8-00; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:21:18 -0400 Original-Received: from ca-crlsbd-u5-c4a-a-172.crlsca.adelphia.net ([24.48.214.172] helo=giblet) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1707iW-0006bg-00 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 17:20:52 -0400 Original-Received: from ttn by giblet with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 1707eM-0004IW-00; Tue, 23 Apr 2002 14:16:34 -0700 Original-To: rlb@defaultvalue.org In-Reply-To: <87vgazuun3.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (message from Rob Browning on Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:10:56 -0500) Errors-To: bug-guile-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:167 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:167 From: Rob Browning Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2002 16:10:56 -0500 I've been trying to make sure to migrate all my 1.6 patches to HEAD, but there are still some outstanding. Of course some of the lag is because I'm not sure we'll want to handle things the same in 1.8. hmmm, this is very different way of looking at things from what i would expect... i'm operating on the assumption that we want to look at things from long-term perspective first and foremost, and interpolate current decisions/activities from that. that is, figure out LATER and then figure out NOW as it relates to LATER, rather than the reverse. in practice, this means changing HEAD branch to conform to LATER first, and branch_release-1-6 to conform to NOW. to me this seems like less work. thi _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile