* Re: unhandled keywords to goops "make" should signal errors [not found] <15498.49326.697620.427859@winona.neilvandyke.org> @ 2002-03-28 4:06 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen [not found] ` <15522.49014.788932.395068@winona.neilvandyke.org> 2002-04-24 18:36 ` Marius Vollmer 1 sibling, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Thien-Thi Nguyen @ 2002-03-28 4:06 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: bug-guile From: "Neil W. Van Dyke" <nwv@neilvandyke.org> Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2002 21:10:54 -0500 Thank you for considering this suggestion. could this be related to: http://www.glug.org/snap/bugs/guile-core/11.html ? thi _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <15522.49014.788932.395068@winona.neilvandyke.org>]
* Re: unhandled keywords to goops "make" should signal errors [not found] ` <15522.49014.788932.395068@winona.neilvandyke.org> @ 2002-03-28 8:19 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Thien-Thi Nguyen @ 2002-03-28 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: bug-guile From: "Neil W. Van Dyke" <nwv@neilvandyke.org> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 02:00:06 -0500 If I understand Bug 11 correctly, then it appears to be a very different problem than the one I report. what you request for consideration must surely have been considered before. if we figure out precisely how it is different and how it is the same, perhaps we can apply that understanding. because my personal coding has not yet advanced to using goops regularly, my conjecture from reading related material is that keyword handling in goops follows a non-blocking scheme reflecting its original design model. i imagine when i do finally get to designing classes and instantiating objects, i would view mixin techniques darkly if they were (in return) so opaque. perhaps i misunderstand the nature of keywords in goops and compare it against other keyword disciplines, fruitlessly. how would i tell? goops can be extended to do such error checking, in any case. thi _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: unhandled keywords to goops "make" should signal errors [not found] <15498.49326.697620.427859@winona.neilvandyke.org> 2002-03-28 4:06 ` unhandled keywords to goops "make" should signal errors Thien-Thi Nguyen @ 2002-04-24 18:36 ` Marius Vollmer 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Marius Vollmer @ 2002-04-24 18:36 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: bug-guile "Neil W. Van Dyke" <nwv@neilvandyke.org> writes: > Currently (latest Guile 1.5.4 from CVS), keyword arguments to the Goops > "make" method that are not handled do not generate errors. > > Unless I misunderstand the way that Goops is to be used, I think that > the default behavior should be to consider unhandled keyword arguments > invalid. Yep. I recorded this as bug 'unhandled-keyargs-should-error'. Thanks! _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-24 18:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <15498.49326.697620.427859@winona.neilvandyke.org>
2002-03-28 4:06 ` unhandled keywords to goops "make" should signal errors Thien-Thi Nguyen
[not found] ` <15522.49014.788932.395068@winona.neilvandyke.org>
2002-03-28 8:19 ` Thien-Thi Nguyen
2002-04-24 18:36 ` Marius Vollmer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).