From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Jaquay Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#11614: compose (in 2.0.5 docs) Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:34:04 -0400 Message-ID: References: <878vfiq4d6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04478725e698fb04c2e773be X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1340199300 23640 80.91.229.3 (20 Jun 2012 13:35:00 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 11614@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 20 15:34:59 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ShL3i-0008Nu-Iq for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:34:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52612 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShL3i-0000Yz-HY for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:34:58 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44114) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShL3V-0000Wg-9w for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:34:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShL3M-0006Nm-Ko for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:34:44 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40042) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ShL3M-0006NS-F7 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:34:36 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ShL6g-0003XT-M0 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:38:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: David Jaquay Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 11614 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 11614-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B11614.134019946213571 (code B ref 11614); Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 11614) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jun 2012 13:37:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49588 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ShL6K-0003Wk-Kq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:37:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com ([209.85.214.172]:45779) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ShL6C-0003WX-HK for 11614@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:37:33 -0400 Original-Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so11688467obb.3 for <11614@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:34:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ADBPlN72JceTx1aGlU+Q3cViKncR/hMUt+naIg0uZic=; b=DoTTfditihAeMIRu+DQbVJo1kmdvUk+rFNieRhsa6nXQKFCaA6VSmLwwncNLrhidCg IVFtg8nETtlt9zJWWFtcE+jUd5+QTak6SCAZcVRecQKs1XcW3cDlnLF5kHzk5Feb9hLJ 4fe+C/zOx8m/Tp3O5Tj+50Tx5aKqgWCnUDoSsBsJZn/2nF46A3nLauoda+lXUeArVQY4 5JbRCJN69x2PdlCzQzGubYoEKpmnQGmMPOLjD38oFFj6rnvul/H/PLr0R94nHMLdPpFn s2s4SfRBe7IEgFg+8xetEjHGGWL9mOfbfEbKioNxXbWomUQguon0STCnZqCmImaIv2Gc SqPA== Original-Received: by 10.182.155.2 with SMTP id vs2mr23574664obb.47.1340199244568; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:34:04 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by 10.76.154.72 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Jun 2012 06:34:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <878vfiq4d6.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6353 Archived-At: --f46d04478725e698fb04c2e773be Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sounds good, thanks. Dave On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Ludovic Court=E8s wrote: > Hi David, > > Sorry for the late reply. > > David Jaquay skribis: > > > Docs for compose, in section 6.9.6, might better read "Compose proc wit= h > > the procedures in rest, such that [the procedures in rest are applied i= n > > order, followed by] proc last, and return the resulting procedure. The > > given procedures must have compatible arity." The existing text seems = to > > imply that only the last procedure in rest is executed before proc. > > The text was changed in the meantime to this: > > -- Scheme Procedure: compose proc1 proc2 ... > Compose PROC1 with the procedures PROC2 ... such that the last > PROC argument is applied first and PROC1 last, and return the > resulting procedure. The given procedures must have compatible > arity. > > How does that sound? > > Thanks, > Ludo=92. > --f46d04478725e698fb04c2e773be Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sounds good, thanks.

Dave


On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 7:16 PM, Ludovic Court=E8s &l= t;ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
Hi David,

Sorry for the late reply.

David Jaquay <djaquay@gmail.com= > skribis:

> Docs for compose, in section 6.9.6, might better read "Compose pr= oc with
> the procedures in rest, such that [the procedures in rest are applied = in
> order, followed by] proc last, and return the resulting procedure. The=
> given procedures must have compatible arity." =A0The existing tex= t seems to
> imply that only the last procedure in rest is executed before proc.
The text was changed in the meantime to this:

=A0-- Scheme Procedure: compose proc1 proc2 ...
=A0 =A0 Compose PROC1 with the procedures PROC2 ... =A0such that the last<= br> =A0 =A0 PROC argument is applied first and PROC1 last, and return the
=A0 =A0 resulting procedure. =A0The given procedures must have compatible<= br> =A0 =A0 arity.

How does that sound?

Thanks,
Ludo=92.

--f46d04478725e698fb04c2e773be--