bug#67797: non-free license listed in module/ice-9/psyntax.scm

["Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu>]

Hey Maxim,

On Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 10:53 AM Maxim Cournoyer
<maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> In our syntax-case implementation, module/ice-9/psyntax.scm, the
> following license text can be found:
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> ;;; Portable implementation of syntax-case
> ;;; Originally extracted from Chez Scheme Version 5.9f
> ;;; Authors: R. Kent Dybvig, Oscar Waddell, Bob Hieb, Carl Bruggeman
>
> ;;; Copyright (c) 1992-1997 Cadence Research Systems
> ;;; Permission to copy this software, in whole or in part, to use this
> ;;; software for any lawful purpose, and to redistribute this software
> ;;; is granted subject to the restriction that all copies made of this
> ;;; software must include this copyright notice in full.  This software
> ;;; is provided AS IS, with NO WARRANTY, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
> ;;; INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY
> ;;; OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
> ;;; AUTHORS BE LIABLE FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES OF ANY
> ;;; NATURE WHATSOEVER.
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> Due to restricting the use to "lawful purpose", it conflicts with the
> (L)GPL, as it places restrictions on running the program.

I don't think this is true. Surely if it was it never would have made
it into Guile, right? I mean... this is GNU we're talking about here
and psyntax has been around awhile! Having been immediately nerdsniped
by this email, I had to quickly do some research.

A 'git blame' dates the quoted license text back to 1998, commit
a63812a2fef2f81b8c4eca04c858e42b62e455f9, by Jim Blandy.

Commit message:

Talked to Stallman.  Actually, the syntax-case copyright is no problem.  Duh.
* Makefile.am (ice9_sources): Revert last change.
* syncase.scm, psyntax.pp, psyntax.ss: Added again.
* Makefile.in: Regeneretade.

This confirms my hunch that there is no issue with the license.

- Dave