In the bad old days, not every thing was documented ... My use of scm_puts
dates back to guile-1.8.  I only ever send it utf8.  I can change my code,
no problem,... I just thought I'd report a regression in case .... others
are affected.

Linas

On Wednesday, March 1, 2017, Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com> wrote:

> On Tue 10 Jan 2017 04:34, Linas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>> writes:
>
> > void *wrap_puts(void* p)
> > {
> >    char *wtf = p;
> >
> >    SCM port = scm_current_output_port ();
> >
> >    scm_puts("the port-encoding is=", port);
> >    scm_puts(scm_to_utf8_string(scm_port_encoding(port)), port);
> >
> >    scm_puts("\nThe string to display is =", port);
> >    scm_puts (wtf, port);
> >
> >    scm_puts("\nWas expecting to see this=", port);
> >    SCM str = scm_from_utf8_string(wtf);
> >    scm_display(str, port);
> >    scm_puts("\n\n", port);
> >
> >    return NULL;
> > }
>
> So, there are a few questions here.  scm_puts and scm_lfwrite are not
> documented, so we need to do basic science on them to see what they are
> supposed to do.
>
> Firstly, is scm_puts() a textual interface or a binary interface?
> I.e. does it write a sequence of characters or a sequence of bytes?
>
> If I look at uses of scm_puts in Guile sources, it seems clear that it's
> a textual interface.  That is to say, at all points, the intention seems
> to be to write characters on a Guile port.  All of the uses are of
> strings.  Please do a "git grep" on your source to see if your
> perceptions correspond.
>
> Now the question is, what encoding is the argument in?  If the port is
> UTF-16, that byte string should be decoded to characters, and that
> character sequence encoded to UTF-16.
>
> All of the scm_puts calls in Guile are of one-byte characters with
> codepoints less than 128, so when doing some port refactoring I chose to
> interpret the argument as latin1.
>
> FTR, in Guile 2.0, this was effectively a binary interface.  Guile 2.0's
> scm_lfwrite interpreted the incoming bytes as ISO-8859-1 codepoints for
> the purposes of updating line and column, but scm_puts and scm_lfwrite
> just wrote out the bytes to the port directly, regardless of the
> encoding.  That was the wrong thing.
>
> Are you arguing that the byte string given to scm_puts should be decoded
> from UTF-8?  That would be OK.
>
> Andy
>