From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Takashi Kato Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#22767: Thread-sleep! doesn't sleep Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 12:37:56 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1456157156 3808 80.91.229.3 (22 Feb 2016 16:05:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:05:56 +0000 (UTC) To: 22767@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 22 17:05:45 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aXszY-0006DM-WC for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 17:05:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49771 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXszY-0001jq-D1 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:05:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41276) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXsv1-0002OR-7Y for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:01:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXsv0-0001yR-Dy for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:01:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41105) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXsv0-0001xq-9b for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:01:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aXsv0-0005qB-1E for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:01:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Takashi Kato Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:01:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: report 22767 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.145615684222410 (code B ref -1); Mon, 22 Feb 2016 16:01:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2016 16:00:42 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38232 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aXsug-0005pN-5n for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:00:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41156) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aXooX-0004Nd-Q2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 06:38:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXooR-0006zb-Ft for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 06:38:00 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:39953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXooR-0006zR-CZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 06:37:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60353) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXooQ-0000gZ-J9 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 06:37:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXooP-0006z2-T7 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 06:37:58 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x233.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::233]:33848) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aXooP-0006yf-Kk for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 06:37:57 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-x233.google.com with SMTP id of3so80139483lbc.1 for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 03:37:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=+5vvJzjwZ/y3ZimrcUu3l+Tx8Ntml1cNHrdVWDPyr40=; b=RBMq0IlSB3ZYAhD6IdmRum/iWFw8MMT3rlTG6gEiN7Lc9jnBDzpqpv01JV0NJSGWvv BQFYJUBBwZcsi2ofw3IS5Syd03xW5x1NdbReaKPpNZjxaoMhmvftEeVYtvmUZdyhAQpE cdI031TGiRHjGcwWNnqjnf45bVCIlgRE2z7EgNn4tJPl+I0HX0SeAaz3OWwTgQ60C/68 eRY5btar6ysBnKmuipNqIw+2RLEp1BzQsuZ0ac5eSeBzjAfNqvNSXwpWghZ3/q/dnRb1 NWOGXVta+YwHdkrCj4DvekJiwSJpVZNI2vTJm29J5zL7Br/qCnlFCs3MsZcs4EkpFKgP EwnQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=+5vvJzjwZ/y3ZimrcUu3l+Tx8Ntml1cNHrdVWDPyr40=; b=jg8/yXe416us3fQCLNPdUcnoQY7fisXKm9CbDFtr/k2aiOa897sN/eDmOPUWKQ1XH7 NBYtxpbeDeE3ooJUGGrDfEHesau2pYLpl5hpS3TXjTXHjMYI/kgAJipxqHCdI+yTKeqa HZUXYR7lckrkWsO9JhCsWXgDyenMT1Do1JBkAoQ8eEXnP/9aXoenFFWgplucoq+eq35y SItUudGLjVHGAW6gE/pp8CdZCE4RDh31j6ASpidORojRcgqBHy+ZXtMpzP4UKDeTRIBp BrIKD+I808HXiuUbLYNvs5kO7FFXnh+vGVOQDfZjqMw87/kPpePtlKU6UvV8JW/JtxNJ ifTg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSOvMlzKrqWeoMMGogAuRnljBKmQZOfHyBu6NiJUzd1ElTF1LqbQqX5yjPFlX5zfV3DKRv3VcHBPnjNOw== X-Received: by 10.112.12.233 with SMTP id b9mr8492157lbc.63.1456141076610; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 03:37:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by 10.112.17.102 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 03:37:56 -0800 (PST) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 11:00:41 -0500 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:7967 Archived-At: Hi there, I think I've found a bug of thread-sleep! defined in SRFI-18 library. The file module/srfi/srfi-18.scm line 233 subtract current time from given timeout argument but this results negative number most of the case. I think this line should simply return timeout as it is. Cheers, -- _/_/ Takashi Kato E-mail: ktakashi19@gmail.com