From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Aberg Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: GIT version: values writing Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:50:45 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87fwsnzju6.fsf@gnu.org> <140431E4-7361-4F1B-A0E4-199E1272E67A@telia.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1296085862 12896 80.91.229.12 (26 Jan 2011 23:51:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 23:51:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ludovic_Court=E8s?= To: Andy Wingo Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 27 00:50:58 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PiF8b-00008y-WA for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:50:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38346 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiF8b-0005Qb-KL for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:50:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56874 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PiF8W-0005Oj-8X for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:50:53 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiF8V-0001FJ-7i for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:50:52 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-out11.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.200]:57674) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PiF8S-0001Ee-Pn; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 18:50:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [10.0.1.199] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out11.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4D0756AC00E5BF27; Thu, 27 Jan 2011 00:50:47 +0100 In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5047 Archived-At: On 26 Jan 2011, at 21:57, Andy Wingo wrote: >> However, quietly loosing values is inviting bugs. > > True. Common Lisp does it though, FWIW. I find it convenient. From what I can see, one can implement a very nice infix notation syntax on top of Guile, which function calls f(x_1, ..., x_k). Then a reification of (values x_1 ... x_k) correspond to tuples (x_1, ..., x_k).