From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Hans Aberg Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10681: GNU Guile 2.0.5 released Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:35:30 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87r4yg3l3e.fsf@gnu.org> <6B207FB0-C631-4DF8-A09D-046E2EB27361@telia.com> <87hazbg341.fsf@netris.org> <0C009B24-5C81-47B1-8C82-97B6DFEC3B68@telia.com> <878vknfywv.fsf@netris.org> <97851F48-92D8-4547-94F0-4945FCE74679@telia.com> <87pqdze3c0.fsf@netris.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328089015 3480 80.91.229.3 (1 Feb 2012 09:36:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 09:36:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10681@debbugs.gnu.org, Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 01 10:36:54 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWcX-0007vQ-HF for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 10:36:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35110 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWcW-00052Y-Mf for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:36:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52529) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWcQ-00052D-LO for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:36:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWcM-0007yW-Mg for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:36:46 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:44578) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWcM-0007yP-Ig for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:36:42 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWcg-00008Q-Ef for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:37:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Hans Aberg Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10681 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10681-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10681.1328088969453 (code B ref 10681); Wed, 01 Feb 2012 09:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10681) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Feb 2012 09:36:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48201 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWbp-00007G-7l for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:36:09 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp-out11.han.skanova.net ([195.67.226.200]:47116) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RsWbn-000074-30 for 10681@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 04:36:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [10.0.1.2] (217.210.127.13) by smtp-out11.han.skanova.net (8.5.133) (authenticated as u26619196) id 4EFC3D3500C093A1; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 10:35:28 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87pqdze3c0.fsf@netris.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6140 Archived-At: On 1 Feb 2012, at 02:42, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Hans Aberg writes: >> With gcc-4.7.0 (from SVN), the test-ffi test now passes (libffi from >> GIT) >=20 > Excellent! I guess that this was a libffi bug. No, I think it is with llvm-gcc, in view of that it remained in that = compile (as described in another letter). >> but I get three other failures. >>=20 >> The compiler that is normally used on the system, is llvm-gcc-4.2, = and >> its compile is still running. >=20 > Please let us know the results of 'make check' when compiling with > llvm-gcc-4.2. I'm especially curious to hear whether the bytevector > tests fail with that compiler as well. There is no such test with the llvm-gcc compiler, strangely enough: it = just produces a few tests. It does not show the header that is shown for = gcc-4.7 (below), like this Hans =46rom gcc-4.7 compile 'make check': Totals for this test run: passes: 34886 failures: 3 unexpected passes: 0 expected failures: 30 unresolved test cases: 29 untested test cases: 1 unsupported test cases: 9 errors: 0