From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Linus =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rnstam?= Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#41320: sxml attributes of some elements are in reverse order Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 14:30:07 +0200 Message-ID: <9b28f66d-59cd-4536-83e0-bf6c783079bc@www.fastmail.com> References: <20200516110207.GC30977@tuxteam.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="73490"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.3.0-dev0-413-g750b809-fmstable-20200507v1 Cc: 41320@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Jan Synacek" , tomas@tuxteam.de Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 16 18:37:36 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jZzoe-000J20-9i for guile-bugs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 May 2020 18:37:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35344 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZzod-0007RI-CN for guile-bugs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 May 2020 12:37:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43638) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZzo7-0007Er-Ou for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 16 May 2020 12:37:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:58275) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jZzo7-0005MS-FL for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 16 May 2020 12:37:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZzo7-0001Hi-D4 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 16 May 2020 12:37:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Linus =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rnstam?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 16 May 2020 16:37:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41320 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile Original-Received: via spool by 41320-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41320.15896469924879 (code B ref 41320); Sat, 16 May 2020 16:37:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41320) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 May 2020 16:36:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41585 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZznc-0001Gb-FN for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 May 2020 12:36:32 -0400 Original-Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28]:53525) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jZvxa-0003I4-G7 for 41320@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:30:35 -0400 Original-Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E735C010D; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:30:28 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from imap1 ([10.202.2.51]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 16 May 2020 08:30:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=veryfast.biz; h= mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to:cc :subject:content-type; s=fm2; bh=O4v0upwjeXvMLElb+Lq9Kjt9VODVg1y aNN7o5WOZ1rM=; b=ttZEefBCaEz4qmD0fWQSC/Ne9veaMUokpZaNBzVmUyPHyTu wGBu8wDqx3/aq9psk0LOU1h7AOltF2c6GzCqm6G0rsneOEAMmaj53hex8koAiy6G 943fLSojvga4+cVFIApB0MOn+OM+E5/Lt46aolwRsDy4kRnYsm5FLRelYOx1f2sR NsA12Yz5Jpt28p4PSJ8FzuCZqpIAzk3rq4y3jzk4H1e3EsLhB+HmmK47ky92ptRL RBog2VxRI6tScG6duA54rNvMYudgSj41zh9FhHBMfPbeIDt+shxTWFX96gDwwM0W W8+q6VibgQcX/mICLRF/drgWQto0802GunYOE/g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=O4v0up wjeXvMLElb+Lq9Kjt9VODVg1yaNN7o5WOZ1rM=; b=mYnwNTx4th8GZVMdJCAqlb 2qPItfb5mAYw0fU+lhAQQHYGf6F4z8VKUkwUKV0kWDqVfTZ14KFS0COiC+vEXh8A MRp/ihXObNHF94Kdm1qCsSG71IF5ZL4S8rHjPnZg38INbuDVyjX3IOZ9YHE14h3Y OG7IaJWYuAtRkJIGaJv6GxV+ypmlIKD3FbQLyJ7Mdw0D9i1F0nVnqfvPW9X8CiWq FeHIKjx/bpX8KC3pePIIANvuP6MavnhVsMfJIZ2ddG24VBUrtqGyfH0ZI4CdrLbM iwMopEH3ClkwXz1ZckIDjeE4V5iK5biUexqACayQGrhuMFTmkjp0/zY+1ClnfAtQ == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddttddghedvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtredtreerjeenucfhrhhomhepnfhinhhu shgpuehjnphrnhhsthgrmhcuoehlihhnuhhsrdgsjhhorhhnshhtrghmsehvvghrhihfrg hsthdrsghiiieqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepuddtvdehgfetuddtheekfeeijeehheej feeukeefheeiteejieffiedvteeiledunecuffhomhgrihhnpehgnhhurdhorhhgnecuve hluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhhinhhushdr sghjohhrnhhsthgrmhesvhgvrhihfhgrshhtrdgsihii X-ME-Proxy: Original-Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 14E12C200A4; Sat, 16 May 2020 08:30:28 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface In-Reply-To: X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 16 May 2020 12:36:31 -0400 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:9763 Archived-At: On Sat, 16 May 2020, at 14:27, Jan Synacek wrote: > I don't really have a strong opinion. I simply thought that the order > in XML->SXML should be the same. Otherwise, I don't see how sxml-match > is actually useful in such a case. Attributes ordering should not matter in sxml-match, as per the manual: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/sxml_002dmatch.html