From: Kevin Ryde <user42@zip.com.au>
Cc: Aubrey Jaffer <agj@alum.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: bug in eqv?
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 08:56:43 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zmjf4ick.fsf@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060324001753.623721B77C9@home.voluntocracy.org> (Aubrey Jaffer's message of "Thu, 23 Mar 2006 19:17:53 -0500 (EST)")
Aubrey Jaffer <agj@alum.mit.edu> writes:
>
> SRFI-77 is the most preliminary of proposals, and guaranteed to be
> withdrawn.
Yep. Seems to me the idea of base r5rs is reasonably clear (not
crystal clear, but near enough) that eqv? is the same as = on numbers.
Keeps the heirarchy of comparisons clean too.
> -- library procedure: equal? obj1 obj2
> `Equal?' recursively compares the contents of pairs, vectors, and
> strings, applying `eqv?' on other objects such as numbers and
> symbols. A rule of thumb is that objects are generally `equal?'
> if they print the same. `Equal?' may fail to terminate if its
> arguments are circular data structures.
>
> If -0.0 and 0.0 print differently, then there is no support for
> (equal? -0.0 0.0) ==> #t.
I would read it that equal? is supposed to be the same as eqv? on
numbers, and the bit about printing is only an aid to understanding
the recursion (and not a terribly helpful one really).
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-24 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-18 3:42 bug in eqv? Aubrey Jaffer
2006-03-21 0:58 ` Kevin Ryde
2006-03-21 23:52 ` Marius Vollmer
2006-03-24 0:17 ` Aubrey Jaffer
2006-03-24 21:56 ` Kevin Ryde [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zmjf4ick.fsf@zip.com.au \
--to=user42@zip.com.au \
--cc=agj@alum.mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).