From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:25:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87zjythmj1.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87pqerdxq4.fsf@pobox.com> <83ehuy698u.fsf@gnu.org> <8362ga5h7h.fsf@gnu.org> <87r4ywpnv0.fsf@gnu.org> <83r4yw49u6.fsf@gnu.org> <87y5smnj86.fsf@pobox.com> <83ehudp29y.fsf@gnu.org> <87fw0s2tmx.fsf@pobox.com> <83a9r0p4jw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361712337 23211 80.91.229.3 (24 Feb 2013 13:25:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ludo@gnu.org, 10474-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 24 14:26:00 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U9baZ-00030F-Ph for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 14:26:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56813 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9baF-0007DC-2j for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 08:25:39 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59958) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9ba6-0007Ct-Uw for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 08:25:37 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9ba5-00057X-SQ for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 08:25:30 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:41405) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U9ba5-00057S-Q3 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 08:25:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9bbb-00039v-35 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 08:27:03 -0500 Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 10474 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 10474@debbugs.gnu.org, wingo@pobox.com, wingo@pobox.com Original-Received: via spool by 10474-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D10474.136171241012123 (code D ref 10474); Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10474-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Feb 2013 13:26:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46867 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9bbM-00039Q-P7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 08:26:49 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:35957 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1U9bbH-00039G-9y for 10474-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 08:26:46 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EC85A9AA; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 08:25:09 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=CQp/DQzrdESHMAKetTD2L2bgm1c=; b=RvrJ4G udACQN+TdjhVGIrcINoPeSjmuL+6Nk8gsI9uSkZTCjBP/CYQ/m8lOUxkGeaeH8zV GZ1q3oLnj9tZHQ/u8WEmPEYIoDZEeiUwDQ+plAA7wY49Nk4HvhYWCH7df0yJoaVo m1zD6C1srxg0obEPoI9oG4pwWm6i+WHistqdQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=buj6zr2gtBsje1v4DX0NBOgiLPIhq6Mz aPaAgLA8SqSzzvjzy8FEoN8071SC8lv3gDfClD5OrLX03DVvJABzRkO27LJkZCZE 4yejvF4fH91kf8XGfiv/+com5ENcosIxzAO5xHwJ4H2fRsVbs5h/uMwCNgipejDZ gPr02HWUJJQ= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DB1A9A9; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 08:25:09 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD634A9A8; Sun, 24 Feb 2013 08:25:08 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83a9r0p4jw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:00:19 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9C2068AC-7E85-11E2-8931-1C2F0E5B5709-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6772 Archived-At: On Tue 19 Feb 2013 19:00, Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > * libguile/load.c (scm_init_load_path) [__MINGW32__]: Convert >> > backslashes to forward slashes in values of GUILE_LOAD_PATH and >> > GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH. >> >> Is this necessary now that backslash is recognized as a file name >> separator? > > Possibly. But are you sure there's no more references to '/' alone in > C code (as opposed to in Scheme)? I am pretty sure, yes. I just pushed some patches to make sure this is the case, altering load.c's logic to be more structurally similar to boot-9.scm's and preferring backslashes on Windows. So with these last commits, hopefully native MinGW builds are supported. Would you mind testing again? Please send a new mail to bug-guile@gnu.org to track any new failures. Thanks, Andy -- http://wingolog.org/