From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#13966: inlining issue? Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 22:06:53 +0200 Message-ID: <87ziqf7hgi.fsf@pobox.com> References: <41C98E11-DE0A-432E-9947-7F75B572FB12@bluewin.ch> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1466453317 29583 80.91.229.3 (20 Jun 2016 20:08:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13966-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Daniel Llorens Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 20 22:08:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bF5Ua-0005rf-GC for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 22:08:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46198 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bF5UW-0001r2-4a for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:08:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40982) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bF5UO-0001pV-3a for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:08:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bF5UI-0001ft-7Z for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:08:07 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:35720) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bF5UI-0001fb-20 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:08:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bF5UH-00020U-V6 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:08:01 -0400 Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 13966 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 13966@debbugs.gnu.org, wingo@pobox.com, daniel.llorens@bluewin.ch Original-Received: via spool by 13966-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D13966.14664532267639 (code D ref 13966); Mon, 20 Jun 2016 20:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13966-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jun 2016 20:07:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48057 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bF5TO-0001z9-20 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:07:06 -0400 Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.pobox.com ([64.147.108.66]:55672 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bF5TM-0001z1-6B for 13966-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:07:04 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997E624E3E; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:07:02 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=0vQEWNOoibdTcTAgHzARTm+HjQI=; b=StgEfl I7N/2zB9SLD3KtbtC7PLYQAAkBv9hzwOyApvVUNAHXtPWeT3Njg6Pd3XIGCVWY9k QyhRvpeQlQBni3eXZUf8obO948kAxkfJKOVZkV7n13LyrcoowJXhpGPo8c/AtHak ioxqlRZOF6+OnvNv5d9gdCWhJWxAZZI2+dvGc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=CvREFUtVSEW88LkXhufbMTjtUW3agumT bZqmdscp67GClkrMMGd4gpRL8HC40CkWAUSP2970MJC1DGpFMIYLlKxI855oJCen TGQhwqsjkzXawGTkM37rWZsCRQQGB11N9gR07t5aFNhHkPUN1bTI3pKDVs4mBzlq OGXhEXCBQDw= Original-Received: from pb-sasl1.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C18124E3C; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:07:02 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from clucks (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE73724E3A; Mon, 20 Jun 2016 16:07:01 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <41C98E11-DE0A-432E-9947-7F75B572FB12@bluewin.ch> (Daniel Llorens's message of "Fri, 15 Mar 2013 13:57:26 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 8D3F204A-3722-11E6-A665-C1836462E9F6-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8042 Archived-At: On Fri 15 Mar 2013 13:57, Daniel Llorens writes: > Compare > > (define f (lambda (a) a)) > (call-with-values (lambda () (values 3 3)) f) > > vs > > (call-with-values (lambda () (values 3 3)) (lambda (a) a)) > > The first one fails with > > :1:0: In procedure f: > :1:0: Wrong number of arguments to # > > The second one gives 3. > > This is Guile 2.0.7.112-f5ea5. > > The behavior of the first case makes (compose f g) fail when f takes less args tan g produces. Fixed in fff013215fb1a5d211df5037dcf52c92063050a8 on master. Thanks for the report! Andy