From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: Zefram <zefram@fysh.org>
Cc: 21899@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#21899: let/ec continuations not distinct under compiler
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 18:29:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ziqaczyx.fsf@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151113075736.GJ13455@fysh.org> (zefram@fysh.org's message of "Fri, 13 Nov 2015 07:57:36 +0000")
On Fri 13 Nov 2015 08:57, Zefram <zefram@fysh.org> writes:
> With guile 2.0.11:
>
> scheme@(guile-user)> (use-modules (ice-9 control))
> scheme@(guile-user)> (list 'a (let/ec ae (list 'b (let/ec be (be 2)))))
> $1 = (a (b 2))
> scheme@(guile-user)> (list 'a (let/ec ae (list 'b (let/ec be (ae 2)))))
> $2 = (a (b 2))
> scheme@(guile-user)> (list 'a (let/ec ae (list 'b (ae 2))))
> $3 = (a 2)
>
> The middle of these three cases is wrong: it attempts to invoke the outer
> escape continuation, but only goes as far as the target of the inner one,
> which it isn't using. It therefore produces the same result as the first
> case, which invokes the inner escape continuation. It ought to behave
> like the third case, which shows that the outer escape continuation can
> be successfully invoked when the unused inner continuation is not present.
This is a compiler bug in 2.0:
scheme@(guile-user)> ,optimize (list 'a (let/ec ae (list 'b (let/ec be (ae 2)))))
$2 = (list 'a
(let ((tag (list 'let/ec)))
(call-with-prompt
tag
(lambda ()
(list 'b
(let ((tag-1 tag)) ;; <<<< here is the bug
(call-with-prompt
tag-1
(lambda () (abort-to-prompt tag 2))
(lambda (_ . results) (@apply values results))))))
(lambda (_ . results) (@apply values results)))))
In master:
scheme@(guile-user)> ,optimize (list 'a (let/ec ae (list 'b (let/ec be (ae 2)))))
$1 = (list 'a
(let ((tag (list 'let/ec)))
(call-with-prompt
tag
(lambda ()
(list 'b
(let ((tag-1 (list 'let/ec)))
(call-with-prompt
tag-1
(lambda () (apply abort tag 2 '()))
(lambda (_ . results) (apply values results))))))
(lambda (_ . results) (apply values results)))))
Weird stuff!
Andy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-24 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-13 7:57 bug#21899: let/ec continuations not distinct under compiler Zefram
2016-06-24 16:29 ` Andy Wingo [this message]
2016-06-24 16:48 ` Andy Wingo
2016-06-24 17:00 ` Zefram
2016-06-24 17:11 ` Zefram
2016-06-24 17:13 ` Andy Wingo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ziqaczyx.fsf@pobox.com \
--to=wingo@pobox.com \
--cc=21899@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=zefram@fysh.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).