From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: Unable to build guile Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 09:42:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87y6zyzhpr.fsf@gnu.org> References: <490CC562.9070501@aceweb.com> <87bpwx98f7.fsf@gnu.org> <490E7842.9040903@aceweb.com> <87d4hdmbw8.fsf@gnu.org> <490F78C1.9020703@aceweb.com> <87ljw01lm1.fsf@gnu.org> <490FB08F.7030903@aceweb.com> <49108B6D.5070901@gentoo.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1225874605 23047 80.91.229.12 (5 Nov 2008 08:43:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2008 08:43:25 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-guile@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 05 09:44:27 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Kxe02-0008NQ-B6 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 09:44:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:39240 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kxdyv-0003zh-5s for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:43:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kxdyq-0003zP-0J for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:43:12 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Kxdym-0003z8-FR for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:43:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=56404 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Kxdym-0003z5-8Q for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:43:08 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:48894 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Kxdyl-0003FZ-Q8 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 03:43:07 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Kxdyk-0008U0-70 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:43:06 +0000 Original-Received: from 193.50.110.60 ([193.50.110.60]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:43:06 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by 193.50.110.60 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Nov 2008 08:43:06 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 193.50.110.60 X-URL: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ X-Revolutionary-Date: 15 Brumaire an 217 de la =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=E9volution?= X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEA52ECF4 X-PGP-Key: http://www.fdn.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: i686-pc-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:TJBfixuqcxDb85CTXSvTkuTQFMA= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:4076 Archived-At: Hi, "Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" writes: > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2008-05/msg00014.html > > already contained a patch for this: > > > --- configure.in.old 2008-05-06 23:48:26.000000000 +0200 > +++ configure.in 2008-05-06 23:48:26.000000000 +0200 > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ > ]), > address@hidden) > AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([build-aux]) > -AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4]) > +AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([guile-config]) > AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR(GUILE-VERSION) This looks suspicious to me: the only M4 macros contained in `guile-config' are Guile's own, so I don't understand why adding this would fix anything. Thanks, Ludo'.