From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10474: Building guile 2.x under mingw + msys Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:59:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87y5smnj86.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87pqerdxq4.fsf@pobox.com> <83ehuy698u.fsf@gnu.org> <8362ga5h7h.fsf@gnu.org> <87r4ywpnv0.fsf@gnu.org> <83r4yw49u6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1328144386 2888 80.91.229.3 (2 Feb 2012 00:59:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 00:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 10474@debbugs.gnu.org, commander.sirow@googlemail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 02 01:59:44 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsl1c-0000EV-28 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:59:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56532 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsl1b-0006ED-21 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:59:43 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:52292) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsl1Y-0006E8-87 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:59:41 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsl1W-0003oB-VQ for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:59:40 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46054) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsl1W-0003o7-SR for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:59:38 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsl1u-0008VO-52 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:00:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10474 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10474-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10474.132814439732662 (code B ref 10474); Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:00:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10474) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Feb 2012 00:59:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49677 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsl1o-0008Ul-UP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:59:57 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:61353 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Rsl1i-0008UZ-Ed for 10474@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:59:54 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E978F83AA; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 19:59:25 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=IRs00QQwsk+qBAfKMRsQJBzysf4=; b=Y0X0GS LeyMTxRTwmQOZcR7rDQg8T1oJa+LyjG0lghFegfkm5u5ixj6bLCBDH6w5wkmjiM5 2hDtp1abjKTXUyckIk4JMt83IEcQxk39iis7cQ7SabNDdZbT5ggvgcFX6MOw6LXP Ze6rbwX+OJ1Lohxd7gWmIsznlu5fiH/m2h+iI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=JfUP7SkrxadQHR26cBs8mN2h1x9nAaIK fMz2f+ivUSTfGy1pZuWiV3hZWTI8Y6uIczmVQWuWNHgavNXje1QEhJGrG4dETy0M qj/CE7adzhInoPM4x9JbFGXeJJaNdGavAkRzkRw0+2uOkr/xFZVtNkUzfOmP9V5n qXTL8O/Koz4= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16FC83A9; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 19:59:25 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [90.164.198.39]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 482CC83A8; Wed, 1 Feb 2012 19:59:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <83r4yw49u6.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 19 Jan 2012 06:04:01 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 26A1DEE0-4D39-11E1-B2B0-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6154 Archived-At: Hi Eli, Ludovic said it already, but it bears repeating: thank you very much for this investigation! I would like to take this task off his back, assuming he's OK with it: the release process was terribly long, and Ludo deserves a rest ;) I will assume that the canonicalize_file_name issues will get resolved eventually in gnulib, once your assignment completes. I will go through the rest of the issues. One thing: Ludo mentions that he had success with a cross-compiled MinGW 3.18 (IIRC?). You were trying with 3.14. Apparently there are 3.19 and 3.20 releases out. Do you know if this is important? I am ignorant regarding MinGW, unfortunately. I'll follow up on your other issues and patches. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/