* GOOPS bug found?
@ 2002-04-17 19:35 Andreas Rottmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Rottmann @ 2002-04-17 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1086 bytes --]
Hi!
[Note: this bug refers to Guile 1.7.0 from CVS, only some days old]
As my C++ <-> Guile bindings (ucxx.sf.net) are approaching
completeness, I have run into another strange problem. I have managed
to isolate the code that causes it and wrote a self-contained C
program that exposes the bug.
Here is what I do:
1) I create a new class, containing one slot using
scm_basic_create_class().
2) I then add a method to 'initialize', specialized for the newly
created class, that calls a C function.
3) I create a new class, inheriting from the C-created class, and
instantiate one object of the new class (using make).
4) I do (define-method (initialize (obj <new-class>) initargs) (next-method)).
This expression leads to this:
ERROR: In procedure struct-ref:
ERROR: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting STRUCTP): ()
A backtrace (using my original code) is attached, but you should
easily be able to reproduce and investigate this strange behaviour
using the attached C program.
I hope someone can shed light on this strange thing...
Regards, Andy
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: bug.c --]
[-- Type: text/x-csrc, Size: 1984 bytes --]
#include <stdio.h>
#include <libguile.h>
static SCM my_constructor(SCM obj, SCM initargs)
{
printf("constructor called!\n");
scm_slot_set_x(obj, scm_str2symbol("a-slot"), SCM_BOOL_T);
return obj;
}
static void set_constructor(SCM klass, SCM (*proc)(SCM, SCM))
{
SCM initialize = scm_variable_ref(
scm_c_module_lookup(scm_module_goops, "initialize"));
SCM sym_obj = scm_str2symbol("obj");
SCM sym_args = scm_str2symbol("args");
SCM constr = scm_c_make_gsubr("constructor", 1, 0, 1, proc);
SCM constrm = scm_closure(scm_list_2(scm_list_2(sym_obj, sym_args),
scm_list_3(constr, sym_obj, sym_args)),
SCM_EOL);
SCM meth = scm_make(scm_list_5(scm_class_method,
scm_c_make_keyword("specializers"),
scm_list_2(klass, scm_class_top),
scm_c_make_keyword("procedure"),
constrm));
scm_add_method(initialize, meth);
}
static void real_main(void *closure, int argc, char *argv[])
{
SCM klass, slots;
scm_load_goops();
slots = scm_list_1(scm_list_3(scm_str2symbol("a-slot"),
scm_c_make_keyword("init-value"),
SCM_BOOL_F));
klass = scm_basic_make_class(scm_class_class, scm_makfrom0str("<my-object>"),
scm_list_1(scm_class_object),
slots);
set_constructor(klass, my_constructor);
scm_c_define("<my-object>", klass);
scm_c_eval_string("(use-modules (oop goops))");
scm_c_eval_string("(define-class <new-object> (<my-object>))");
scm_c_eval_string("(make <new-object>)");
// this produces the error
scm_c_eval_string("(define-method (initialize (obj <new-object>) initargs)"
" (next-method))");
}
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
scm_boot_guile(argc, argv, real_main, NULL);
return 0;
}
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 232 bytes --]
--
Andreas Rottmann | Dru@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: GOOPS bug found?
[not found] <87sn5uce57.fsf@alice.rhinosaur.lan>
@ 2002-04-17 20:01 ` Andreas Rottmann
2002-05-07 18:19 ` Marius Vollmer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Rottmann @ 2002-04-17 20:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 343 bytes --]
Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann@gmx.at> writes:
> Hi!
>
> [Note: this bug refers to Guile 1.7.0 from CVS, only some days old]
>
<snip/>
> A backtrace (using my original code) is attached, but you should
> easily be able to reproduce and investigate this strange behaviour
> using the attached C program.
>
Forgot the backtrace, here it is:
[-- Attachment #2: backtrace --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 2594 bytes --]
Backtrace:
In unknown file:
?: 0* [primitive-load "bug.scm"]
In bug.scm:
7: 1* (define-method (initialize (obj <MyObject>) initargs) (next-method))
7: 2 (begin (if # #) (add-method! initialize #))
In unknown file:
?: 3 [add-method! #<<generic> initialize (13)> ...
?: 4* (method ((obj <MyObject>) initargs) (next-method))
?: 5 [make-instance #<ucxx:meta:<Plugin> <method> 80844c0> #:specializers ...]
In /usr/local/share/guile/1.7.0/oop/goops.scm:
1420: 6 (let ((instance #)) (initialize instance initargs) instance)
1421: 7* [initialize #<<method> 8086a90> (#:specializers (# #) #:procedure ...)]
In unknown file:
?: 8* [memoize-method! #<<generic> initialize (13)> (# #) ...]
In /usr/local/share/guile/1.7.0/oop/goops/dispatch.scm:
241: 9* (let ((applicable #)) (cond (applicable #) (# #) (else # # #)))
245: 10 (cond (applicable #) (# #) (else # # #))
251: 11 (let* ((new #) (res #)) (set-cdr! (cdr exp) (cddr new)) res)
253: 12* (cond (# #) (# #) (else #))
257: 13 [method-cache-install! #<procedure hashed-method-cache-insert! #> # # ...]
...
289: 14 (let* ((types #) (entry+cmethod #)) (insert! exp (car entry+cmethod)) ...)
291: 15* [hashed-method-cache-insert! (#@dispatch args 2 0 ...) (# # # # ...)]
169: 16 (let* ((cache #) (size #)) (let* (# # # ...) (do # # ...) ...))
171: 17 (let* ((entries #) (size #) (min-misses size) ...) (do (#) (#) ...) ...)
180: 18* (do ((hashset 0 (+ 1 hashset))) ((= hashset hashsets)) ...)
182: 19* (let* ((test-cache #) (misses #)) (cond (# # # # ...) (# # # #)))
183: 20* [cache-try-hash! 4 0 ...]
210: 21 (let ((max-misses 0) (mask #)) (catch (quote misses) (lambda () #) ...))
212: 22 [catch misses #<procedure #f ()> #<procedure #f (key misses)>]
In unknown file:
?: 23* [#<procedure #f ()>]
In /usr/local/share/guile/1.7.0/oop/goops/dispatch.scm:
214: 24* (do ((ls entries (cdr ls)) (misses 0 0)) ((null? ls) max-misses) ...)
217: 25* (do ((i # #)) ((not #) (vector-set! cache i ...)) ...)
217: 26* [logand 3 ...
217: 27* [cache-hashval 0 (# # () # ...)]
203: 28 (let ((hashset-index #)) (do (# #) (# sum) (set! sum #)))
204: 29 (do ((sum 0) (classes entry #)) ((environment? #) sum) ...)
207: 30* (set! sum (+ sum (struct-ref (car classes) hashset-index)))
207: 31* [+ 4312081437 ...
207: 32* [struct-ref () 6]
/usr/local/share/guile/1.7.0/oop/goops/dispatch.scm:207:24: In procedure struct-ref in expression (struct-ref (car classes) hashset-index):
/usr/local/share/guile/1.7.0/oop/goops/dispatch.scm:207:24: Wrong type argument in position 1 (expecting STRUCTP): ()
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 237 bytes --]
Andy
--
Andreas Rottmann | Dru@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: GOOPS bug found?
[not found] <87sn5uce57.fsf@alice.rhinosaur.lan>
2002-04-17 20:01 ` GOOPS bug found? Andreas Rottmann
@ 2002-05-07 18:19 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-05-12 13:17 ` Andreas Rottmann
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marius Vollmer @ 2002-05-07 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: bug-guile, guile-devel
Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann@gmx.at> writes:
> As my C++ <-> Guile bindings (ucxx.sf.net) are approaching
> completeness, I have run into another strange problem. I have managed
> to isolate the code that causes it and wrote a self-contained C
> program that exposes the bug.
Thanks! I have recorded this as bug 'goops-1'. I haven't looked at
it yet. If you can investigate this further, that would be great...
please refer to bug 'goops-1' if you have some followup.
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: GOOPS bug found?
2002-05-07 18:19 ` Marius Vollmer
@ 2002-05-12 13:17 ` Andreas Rottmann
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Rottmann @ 2002-05-12 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
Cc: bug-guile, guile-devel
Marius Vollmer <mvo@zagadka.ping.de> writes:
> Andreas Rottmann <a.rottmann@gmx.at> writes:
>
> > As my C++ <-> Guile bindings (ucxx.sf.net) are approaching
> > completeness, I have run into another strange problem. I have managed
> > to isolate the code that causes it and wrote a self-contained C
> > program that exposes the bug.
>
> Thanks! I have recorded this as bug 'goops-1'. I haven't looked at
> it yet. If you can investigate this further, that would be great...
>
I have investigated to the level I understand.. I can't grok really
what's happending in the called functions in the backtrace as I'm no
guile guru...
Andy
--
Andreas Rottmann | Dru@ICQ | 118634484@ICQ | a.rottmann@gmx.at
http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc
Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-05-12 13:17 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <87sn5uce57.fsf@alice.rhinosaur.lan>
2002-04-17 20:01 ` GOOPS bug found? Andreas Rottmann
2002-05-07 18:19 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-05-12 13:17 ` Andreas Rottmann
2002-04-17 19:35 Andreas Rottmann
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).