From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10163: Incomplete/vague section of Guile Manual Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:34:28 -0500 Message-ID: <87wr9opte3.fsf@pobox.com> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1324564515 11724 80.91.229.12 (22 Dec 2011 14:35:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10163-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ryan Fox Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 22 15:35:09 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Rdjjg-00055n-Hk for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:35:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41357 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Rdjjf-0001It-V6 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:35:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:58207) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdjjY-0001F1-MU for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:35:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdjjQ-0008BY-SP for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:35:00 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:48114) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RdjjQ-0008BO-Op for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:34:52 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RdjlW-0002ZD-LA for bug-guile@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:37:02 -0500 Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 10163 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 10163@debbugs.gnu.org, wingo@pobox.com Original-Received: via spool by 10163-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D10163.13245646119850 (code D ref 10163); Thu, 22 Dec 2011 14:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10163-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Dec 2011 14:36:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RdjlH-0002Yj-Nx for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:36:51 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62] helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RdjlB-0002YY-Jd for 10163-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:36:46 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F2D8796; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:34:30 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=ZkLVlSdNyPC6 DeLlZv3S5xKGcUc=; b=fwpLJAQtNXbARUs/ZWgDaJHe8+8kGDT+87tL5gnheXVm i/qAoe8/leGHRJm1SUl9HFWkDzbJVX3nlOzYr/wHYk3Yo+AQp7NmVxQbjg/SfoKv ocahPfOg9bXyqhoroyG3jTuKH4umjyaEBi4bFwNqEMx8zShYHIBPy4Vfoj9BpFs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=xcqfgh 38yIZ4BGiMj7hcjy7V7+5nsj6lyk+Pqv0OC1R3yDnOoY4te0Ptez+tWPXafz+R/1 SxOUB12p84BVVFRLffpzdzc8UA9CLUvk0iRQtx6O3UyINrvUI4bchZ2YBaX1RdjL 5seDIsDpwzNXYZpOs3rQQZyi16DXKi9PwTpNM= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFED38795; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:34:30 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [184.174.165.119]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C4878794; Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:34:30 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Ryan Fox's message of "Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:17:18 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0EFDCB0A-2CAA-11E1-8FE5-65B1DE995924-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 09:37:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6009 Archived-At: Hi Ryan, Thanks for the report. On Tue 29 Nov 2011 20:17, Ryan Fox writes: > /* Check that arg is really a shape SMOB. */ > SCM_VALIDATE_SHAPE (SCM_ARG1, shape); > > After some searching, I was able to figure out that the > function=C2=A0scm_assert_smob_type() is probably the intended behaviour f= or > this. However, > there was no indication of this in the description. I changed the example and the text to use scm_assert_smob_type. This entire section could use some modernization and less hand-waving, but that is a larger project. Happy hacking, Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/