From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10627: char-ready? is broken for multibyte encodings Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:59:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87wqtuyhgi.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87ipjwktzv.fsf@netris.org> <87d2vpedc9.fsf@pobox.com> <87ip5h79ma.fsf@tines.lan> <87y5ed8ika.fsf@pobox.com> <87a9qt6yux.fsf@tines.lan> <87ehg493hr.fsf@pobox.com> <87fw0i26ss.fsf@tines.lan> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1361908838 11586 80.91.229.3 (26 Feb 2013 20:00:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:00:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10627@debbugs.gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 26 21:01:00 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UAQhu-00046I-7R for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:00:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34570 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAQhZ-00032t-Gg for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:00:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55502) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAQhS-00032Z-Rh for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:00:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAQhG-0004gh-0n for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:00:30 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46187) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UAQhE-0004g5-IV for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:00:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAQiv-0004dm-Te for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10627 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10627-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10627.136190887917787 (code B ref 10627); Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:02:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10627) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2013 20:01:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51651 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAQiD-0004cp-QH for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:01:18 -0500 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:46118 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UAQiB-0004ci-0Z for 10627@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 15:01:16 -0500 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3926BA9A5; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:59:28 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=lWPgLd5Jdf0Ble+ifQArrOyNV1Q=; b=oFsY75 mYvmvXI/SUJGir6Z2QtX3RarYXc85627cIAZNAoOFGxZoPx6a9J52Ysrs3AAZVfE CpC7rXI6GJTQuDWy0rZc8KGt8SorwgQfwM+BGFzmnYA4A0CqYQg/OsmG1kaEsDbP N8Ni0w8Ml2tsg0sszuP1hXCRUYt0wJvBVV5OY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=rrcifPQXiSMTm5gD6Y9bBXr2YWu+sAAb Ny95rxTqIa5JMc9GKxvaF6cAmvKnIbZfk7U2bAq5O2yI5gnlWdolH39BZ6HByhWp vn6UJ8MqciffZ+dapZFe9HzLWzTW00oxPCdgwq3lw3vZ8uxLcdlQvQf2cF9mWVrP fjsh8yyVIIU= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30DA1A9A4; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:59:28 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B79D5A9A3; Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:59:27 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <87fw0i26ss.fsf@tines.lan> (Mark H. Weaver's message of "Tue, 26 Feb 2013 14:50:43 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 06C34EF2-804F-11E2-B087-79910E5B5709-02397024!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6794 Archived-At: On Tue 26 Feb 2013 20:50, Mark H Weaver writes: > Andy Wingo writes: >> Are you proposing that `char-ready?' do a nonblocking read if >> the buffer is empty? That could work. > > Yes. I suspect that something along these lines is already implemented, > because I don't see how 'u8-ready?' could work properly without it. It does a poll with a timeout of 0. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/