From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: Segmentation fault Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:18:49 +0100 Message-ID: <87ve8wbyt2.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <20071010180101.219520@gmx.net> <87k5pkf19g.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87d4vbik6z.fsf@laas.fr> <87ejfqlrgc.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87sl4687tk.fsf@chbouib.org> <87fy042nl0.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87r6jojgal.fsf@chbouib.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1193221156 29060 80.91.229.12 (24 Oct 2007 10:19:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 10:19:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 24 12:19:15 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IkdKS-0000Et-I6 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 12:19:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkdKK-0003x4-CE for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:19:04 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IkdKE-0003uo-1W for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:18:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IkdKD-0003uO-7a for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:18:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IkdKD-0003uH-1L for bug-guile@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:18:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IkdK8-0004Hi-2D; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 06:18:52 -0400 Original-Received: from arudy (host86-145-152-23.range86-145.btcentralplus.com [86.145.152.23]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592261F696B; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:18:50 +0100 (BST) Original-Received: from laruns (unknown [192.168.0.10]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD4B238009; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 11:18:49 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: <87r6jojgal.fsf@chbouib.org> (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?s's?= message of "Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:42:26 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:3647 Archived-At: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=E8s) writes: > Hi, > > Neil Jerram writes: > >> So would then ask people to raise bugs on savannah, instead of >> emailing bug-guile? Or can we implement something to catch emails to >> bug-guile and automatically raise corresponding bugs on savannah? >> (Surely someone has done that already?) > > The former. I'm not sure the latter is easily feasible. It would be convenient if it worked though, as then we wouldn't have to invalidate "email bug-guile@gnu.org" as a method of reporting bugs. I feel like having a go at this; I'll report back on how it goes. > Actually, some people already used the bug tracker to report bugs, but > most don't. Yes. Ideally both methods would work and would have the same results. Regards, Neil _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile