From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Neil Jerram Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: Typos in the manual Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:49:07 +0000 Message-ID: <87vd0k7tak.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> References: <20110208202529.GD16805@gmx.de> <874o88kbbs.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <20110213070044.GA26711@gmx.de> <4D5AA042.7080904@gentoo.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297813808 26128 80.91.229.12 (15 Feb 2011 23:50:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:50:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org, Ralf Wildenhues To: Marijn Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Feb 16 00:50:04 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PpUeg-00065j-Jw for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 00:50:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43978 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PpUeg-0000mi-8D for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=47571 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PpUea-0000mT-JM for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:49:57 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PpUeZ-0006A6-Hd for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:49:56 -0500 Original-Received: from mail3.uklinux.net ([80.84.72.33]:56233) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PpUeZ-00065a-Cx for bug-guile@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 18:49:55 -0500 Original-Received: from arudy (unknown [78.145.19.199]) by mail3.uklinux.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CD31F6648; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:49:12 +0000 (GMT) Original-Received: from neil-laptop (unknown [192.168.11.4]) by arudy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8634E3801E; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:49:11 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <4D5AA042.7080904@gentoo.org> (Marijn's message of "Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:48:18 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-Received-From: 80.84.72.33 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5143 Archived-At: Marijn writes: > Reading the quoted text I can't help but wonder what a "sublimated > desire" is. According to wiktionary "sublimated" is the past tense of > "sublimate" which has 3 meanings[1] none of which I recognize as the > intended meaning. Perhaps "subliminal desire"[2] is meant, that is, a > desire that is so faint that it is not discernible by the conscious > mind, but that usage is said to be reserved for stimuli and one may > consider it a stretch to include a desire under stimuli. If my analysis > so far seems correct I tentatively propose "secret desire" or "furtive > desire" as corrections. Thanks, I agree. I'll just delete "sublimated", as I think it reads well with no adjective there. Neil