From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#10974: guile-user@gnu.org Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 23:45:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87vci5rg54.fsf@pobox.com> References: <87wr2mv6y4.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1341265594 24249 80.91.229.3 (2 Jul 2012 21:46:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 21:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10974@debbugs.gnu.org, Alexei Matveev To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 02 23:46:32 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SloRz-0003C7-FE for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 23:46:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43437 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SloRy-0006CC-CD for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:46:30 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:45900) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SloRu-0006Ba-Sh for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:46:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SloRt-0000J7-2Q for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:46:26 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33975) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SloRs-0000Iy-Su for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:46:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SloWM-0000k0-3K for bug-guile@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Andy Wingo Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 21:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10974 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10974-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10974.13412658272803 (code B ref 10974); Mon, 02 Jul 2012 21:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10974) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jul 2012 21:50:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43521 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SloVm-0000jA-TZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:50:27 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([74.115.168.62]:62801 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1SloVl-0000j3-Az for 10974@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 17:50:25 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E47AC1BF; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:45:47 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=sasl; bh=q3bOG54AVepG VIV9Tbv73LDFKi8=; b=pGgv6VgLGxaboc1j0QZplorL/5SmeQOaVShHoQpnf4rg pZGcRnXqqpsR5CEU8w7lFfS1E3lku3frLpXpbkwp/dWX6hOFnlScAW4Mx0JxkyoF kW4v+xVPmtlTba6OJpttYMLHgxtrshIbeE1ARQ+Uo4+CMm/DIYf2gFDN1vxyjrM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=sasl; b=lgMBqO NC6YPA+XspqL/28vH/5TssYZ6nI7Rkg28ml/okWpVqtrsnUny2BO8uZYWmcpAq6/ EosBM+oJKu+CHoJsDd6uPxkrY0nLwb9HwPP27axHzjkfjoFtL+4N+JfR0YfWs9lB LCLdWPRDMRH7srjoY4g3fMgofflz6oeIfMaQE= Original-Received: from b-pb-sasl-sd. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36CDFC1BE; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:45:47 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [89.131.176.233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9AA52C1BD; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:45:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87wr2mv6y4.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Mon, 02 Jul 2012 11:38:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 48288D70-C48F-11E1-9CDB-FA6787E41631-02397024!b-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:6375 Archived-At: On Mon 02 Jul 2012 11:38, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) writes: > The macros in numbers.h that are =E2=80=9Csymbol macros=E2=80=9D, such as > =E2=80=98scm_from_int=E2=80=99, allow users to write code like: > > &scm_from_int > > This wouldn=E2=80=99t be possible if these were function macros. Interesting, I hadn't thought of that. > Thus, I think things will have to remain this way. Would this be "fixed" if we changed these to be implemented as inline functions? Dunno, just thinking out loud. Andy --=20 http://wingolog.org/