From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: bug#25463: guile-2.0.13 Check errors Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:18:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87vasfqfat.fsf__15556.9771807224$1486934353$gmane$org@gnu.org> References: <4f693f6528e76a93e17e73450e2bc320@openmailbox.org> <87vasg1luf.fsf@gnu.org> <6f657e5c558f7594b14d50dea55f79bd@openmailbox.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1486934353 7980 195.159.176.226 (12 Feb 2017 21:19:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:19:13 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, rennes@openmailbox.org, 25463@debbugs.gnu.org, Richard Braun To: Manolis Ragkousis Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 12 22:19:07 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1Y3-0001dz-3Z for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:19:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53466 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1Y8-0007ur-OF for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:19:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1Y3-0007uj-Es for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:19:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1Xy-0005hw-Fi for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:19:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39274) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1Xy-0005hp-DH for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1Xy-0005xw-6b for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guile@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25463 X-GNU-PR-Package: guile X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25463-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25463.148693430522886 (code B ref 25463); Sun, 12 Feb 2017 21:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25463) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Feb 2017 21:18:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37473 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1XM-0005x3-Nu for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:18:24 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59282) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1XL-0005wm-6J for 25463@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:18:23 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1XE-0005UM-M6 for 25463@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:18:17 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:50836) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1X4-0005RO-DU; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:18:06 -0500 Original-Received: from reverse-83.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.83]:55812 helo=ribbon) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cd1X3-00053n-KV; Sun, 12 Feb 2017 16:18:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Manolis Ragkousis's message of "Sun, 12 Feb 2017 15:44:36 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-guile" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:8539 Archived-At: Hello! Manolis Ragkousis skribis: > Locally on Hurd I am using this patch > http://paste.lisp.org/display/338954 on the glibc/hurd package to work > around that test failure. Ideally we need to modify the way guile > handles time.[1] Does =E2=80=98glibc/hurd=E2=80=99 have this patch in =E2=80=98core-updates= =E2=80=99? Should it? Would it make sense to address this issue in Guile instead of libc, Richard? I guess the answer depends on how many programs make this assumption besides Guile. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.