From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andy Wingo Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs,gmane.lisp.guile.devel Subject: Re: Guile with win32 cross compiling Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:52:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87tyb66rcr.fsf@pobox.com> References: <20110326220651.GA8300@flap> <20110401185020.GC13643@flap> <20110423161003.GB20479@flap> <20110516230101.GB3311@flap> <20110520122552.GA2454@flap> <20110520221931.GB2223@flap> <87wrgk96dq.fsf@pobox.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309528368 28092 80.91.229.12 (1 Jul 2011 13:52:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2011 13:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org, guile-devel@gnu.org To: Volker Grabsch Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 01 15:52:44 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qce9C-0004PW-Np for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:52:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40733 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qce9B-00014x-Cd for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:52:41 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51978) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qce8h-00013N-61 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:52:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qce8f-0004W7-J4 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:52:10 -0400 Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:39774 helo=sasl.smtp.pobox.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qce8f-0004W1-9x; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 09:52:09 -0400 Original-Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381D25444; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 09:54:23 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=K5Gj2RYTpTRMOsM3/+ddP24fQ/8=; b=UvtZsy njKW4WQ5k5GqGBXneZRrVRJ463I1voVWii/RCXGsGIB4JXUu2mcNJriQrGpYiGOo PMZ/C1qqQEFWGd2p40nBOGj/trMddta1YPyv3yTv7IEJl+C3MUvU+wQdCatggMRd nKDGNRDw84ATXabdbSUaL2apEmG6ESXcRvmB0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=ANvpgtLSOcJPVIrrbsC9ejrtiPElzfdj aV17O6mewvF0UINElwhAadHhJZ+bGS8tagg3wnR5K6GlY5kYodWqJG+Dr6QYA+BH bph0Y0kcGkzw6g1e4tMuR2TImorSIan789v4i/cBV3/NW+X9XJ8W0RQkew8COPAK MSJmMRPMyZI= Original-Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309275443; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 09:54:23 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from badger (unknown [95.21.56.70]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77D255442; Fri, 1 Jul 2011 09:54:22 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87wrgk96dq.fsf@pobox.com> (Andy Wingo's message of "Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:03:44 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 9FE5E11A-A3E9-11E0-BB58-5875C023C68D-02397024!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 (beta) X-Received-From: 64.74.157.62 X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:5701 gmane.lisp.guile.devel:12629 Archived-At: On Fri 17 Jun 2011 11:03, Andy Wingo writes: > The libgc list is gc@linux.hpl.hp.com. I have found the libgc > maintainers to be very responsive. If there is a problem with mingw and > threads that is fixed by Jan's patches, I'm sure they would be happy to > have them. Who will submit them there, Jan or Volker? I submitted that patch; we'll see. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/