From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kevin Ryde Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: CVS-060720 compilation failure on Solaris 10, patch Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:45:29 +1000 Message-ID: <87slkrn5c6.fsf@zip.com.au> References: <44BEFCF4.5020301@student.liu.se> <87hd1c67cq.fsf@laas.fr> <44BF7203.6060500@student.liu.se> <44BF771A.7080302@student.liu.se> <87u05byg9q.fsf@zip.com.au> <44C07485.4060202@student.liu.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1153705558 4126 80.91.229.2 (24 Jul 2006 01:45:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 01:45:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-guile@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jul 24 03:45:57 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G4pW6-0000Rh-Bj for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 03:45:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G4pW5-0002hd-GB for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:45:53 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G4pW1-0002hK-M6 for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:45:49 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1G4pVx-0002h0-Rg for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:45:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1G4pVx-0002gx-My for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:45:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [61.8.0.84] (helo=mailout1.pacific.net.au) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1G4pWw-0000kG-Gq for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 21:46:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (mailproxy2.pacific.net.au [61.8.2.163]) by mailout1.pacific.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BAED328241; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:45:41 +1000 (EST) Original-Received: from localhost (ppp2DCC.dyn.pacific.net.au [61.8.45.204]) by mailproxy2.pacific.net.au (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3sarge1) with ESMTP id k6O1jeLE012086; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:45:41 +1000 Original-Received: from gg by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1G4pVh-0007JG-00; Mon, 24 Jul 2006 11:45:29 +1000 Original-To: Claes Wallin In-Reply-To: <44C07485.4060202@student.liu.se> (Claes Wallin's message of "Fri, 21 Jul 2006 08:30:29 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:3307 Archived-At: Claes Wallin writes: > > It seems that isinf is c99, and that earlier gcc:s supported it in isoc > as a GNU extension. If we're using c99, why not specify it? What good > things will be turned off? Every time I've had the misfortune to experiment with standards-modes on headers or whatever it's been painful. I think _POSIX_SOURCE losing all GNU extras was the most recent bad bit in guile. Is isinf missed on solaris? Is there another way to ask for it? _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile