Re: 1.8.2 srfi-19 warns about current-time

[ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)]

Hi,

Gregory Marton <gremio@csail.mit.edu> writes:

> Can I help?  I mean, presuming that the sentence above, or some
> extension, is reasonable documentation?  I get a sense that there is a
> reluctance to document things because that entails a commitment to
> supporting them in the future -- is that the issue here?

Not really.  I was planning to document part of the `module-' procedure
but never did it.  In case you want to do it, those worth documenting
(IMO) are the following:

  module-define!
  module-defined?
  module-duplicates-handlers
  module-export!
  module-for-each
  module-map
  module-name
  module-public-interface
  module-re-export!
  module-ref
  module-remove!
  module-replace!
  module-reverse-lookup  ;; with xref to the "Variables" node
  module-set!
  module-variable        ;; with xref to the "Variables" node

This would go under the "Module System Reflection" node.  Feel free to
contribute!  :-)

> Being new to the community, I don't have a sense of how this strange
> library system called srfi works.

SRFIs are a community standardization process among Scheme
implementors and users:

  http://srfi.schemers.org/

Anyone can propose an SRFI, but you wouldn't amend an SRFI just to make
such or such implementation happier.  The idea is to provide APIs
portable among implementations.  In practice, they are often implemented
as a layer above the implementation's own API for the same purpose.

Thanks,
Ludovic.



_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
Bug-guile@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile