From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?iso-8859-1?Q?Court=E8s?=) Newsgroups: gmane.lisp.guile.bugs Subject: Re: Segmentation fault Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 11:16:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87sl4687tk.fsf@chbouib.org> References: <20071010180101.219520@gmx.net> <87k5pkf19g.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> <87d4vbik6z.fsf@laas.fr> <87ejfqlrgc.fsf@ossau.uklinux.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1192871846 23998 80.91.229.12 (20 Oct 2007 09:17:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:17:26 +0000 (UTC) To: bug-guile@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 20 11:17:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: guile-bugs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IjASV-0008DZ-7X for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 11:17:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjASN-0004Xy-B9 for guile-bugs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 05:17:19 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IjASI-0004XX-QB for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 05:17:14 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IjASE-0004U9-Ti for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 05:17:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjASE-0004U6-Io for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 05:17:10 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IjASE-0000m8-7S for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 05:17:10 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1IjAS3-0002Ch-4X for bug-guile@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:16:59 +0000 Original-Received: from adh419.fdn.fr ([80.67.176.9]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:16:59 +0000 Original-Received: from ludo by adh419.fdn.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 20 Oct 2007 09:16:59 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 40 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: adh419.fdn.fr X-URL: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ X-PGP-Key-ID: 0xEB1F5364 X-PGP-Key: http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/ludovic.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 821D 815D 902A 7EAB 5CEE D120 7FBA 3D4F EB1F 5364 X-OS: i486-pc-linux-gnu User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:EWv6IsCdk70hz976DWuf9GzH+84= X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: bug-guile@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GUILE, GNU's Ubiquitous Extension Language" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guile-bounces+guile-bugs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.lisp.guile.bugs:3629 Archived-At: Hi Neil, Neil Jerram writes: > ludovic.courtes@laas.fr (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> (I had forgotten about it, which may be an indication that we should >> really start using the bug tracker.) > > What would that involve? Not much actually. Just mention it in the relevant pieces of documentation. The bug tracker automatically sends emails to `bug-guile' when new bugs are reported or when the status of existing bugs changes. We can also assign a bug to a specific developer, which can help coordinate efforts. > Yes, I meant to do that but forgot. No need for with-output-to-port > though; just need to change the second arg of display-backtrace to > (%make-void-port "w"). Right. > I looked at that, but couldn't work out what unmemoize-expr's args > should be. Also, this would make the test depart further from the > reported scenario. So I think best to stick with using > display-backtrace. OK. > Yes, I'll do that. There's a couple of places in the tests that use > debug-enable/disable like this, so it's worth adding a > with-debugging-evaluator form to (test-suite lib). Yes, makes sense. Can you also add a `NEWS' entry? Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile