unofficial mirror of bug-guile@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Wingo <wingo@pobox.com>
To: Anand Mohanadoss <anand108@gmail.com>
Cc: 20079-done@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#20079: Fwd: Memory leak from seek/ftell with files larger than 2GB
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 15:01:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87shw4njne.fsf@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFNjtaDjUrzS2pNsO6RPHD1-iNYnPyJzSwVOtW6tT95+kKCHwQ@mail.gmail.com> (Anand Mohanadoss's message of "Wed, 11 Mar 2015 18:08:18 +0530")

Hi,

Thank you very much for this one!  Turns out we had an incredibly
embarrassing bug in which we forgot to attach finalizers for bignums
created by scm_from_{uint64,int64} on 32-bit platforms.  Fixed in master
and stable-2.0.

Cheers,

Andy

On Wed 11 Mar 2015 13:38, Anand Mohanadoss <anand108@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I had sent the following to the user forum and did not receive any
> comments. I am reposting it in the bug forum with the hope that one of
> the experts may be able to comment...
>
> Thanks,
> Anand
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Anand Mohanadoss <anand108@gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 9:35 PM
> Subject: Memory leak from seek/ftell with files larger than 2GB
> To: guile-user@gnu.org
>
> Hi,
>
> We are seeing an issue with seek and ftell leaking memory with files
> larger than 2GB.
>
> We are using 2.0.11 guile built as a 32-bit application with large
> file support enabled (guile was built using gcc 4.4.0 for Linux with
> flags _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64, _LARGEFILE_SOURCE and _
> LARGEFILE64_SOURCE). The issue also appears to happen with guile 2.2.
>
> The memory leaks start only after the offset exceeds maximum positive
> value for a 32-bit signed integer. ftell and seek do work as expected
> (given how lseek should work with large file support).
>
> Appended is a program that illustrates the problem. The first seek
> simply skips the part of the file where you won't see a memory leak.
> If you comment out ftell and the second seek lines and un-comment the
> lines that follow them, there is no memory leak. 
>
> Is this a bug in guile or should we be doing things differently? If
> this is a known issue, is there a recommended work around?
>
> Thanks,
> Anand
>
> (define MAX_SIGNED_INT 2147483647)
> (define BYTES_TO_READ 10)
>
> (define file "/tmp/test.pcap") ;sample file greater than 2.5GB
>
> (define (traverse file)
> (let* ((port (open-input-file file #:binary #t))
> (file-sz (stat:size (stat port)))
> (ua (make-bytevector BYTES_TO_READ 0))
> (cur-offset 0))
> (seek port (- MAX_UNSIGNED_INT 1000) SEEK_CUR)
> (while (< (ftell port) (- file-sz BYTES_TO_READ))
> ;(while (< cur-offset (- file-sz BYTES_TO_READ))
> (seek port BYTES_TO_READ SEEK_CUR)
> ;(get-bytevector-n! port ua 0 BYTES_TO_READ)
> (set! cur-offset (+ BYTES_TO_READ cur-offset)))
> (close-port port))) 
>
> (traverse file)





  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-23 13:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAFNjtaA+apdrw3dhze-jSQ-Qo9j9jWpDmD=BwKCvC1DWc14=8Q@mail.gmail.com>
2015-03-11 12:38 ` bug#20079: Fwd: Memory leak from seek/ftell with files larger than 2GB Anand Mohanadoss
2016-06-23 12:22   ` Andy Wingo
2016-06-23 13:01   ` Andy Wingo [this message]
2016-06-23 14:43     ` Anand Mohanadoss

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87shw4njne.fsf@pobox.com \
    --to=wingo@pobox.com \
    --cc=20079-done@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=anand108@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).